Re: [Valgrind-developers] valgrind

[Dirk M. <dm...@gm...>]

On Monday 17 November 2003 13:15, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:

> Fair enough if you're getting commit logs for all of KDE.  (People really
> do that?  Wow.)

Sure, thats the point of commit logs anyway (peer review and all that). 

> Assuming this is just for Valgrind commits, I say the higher the better;
> the bigger it is, the more likely I want to look at it, and we don't have
> many big commits.  Trimming isn't important.  Others may disagree.

Yeah. like those complaining that they get commit logs at all :)

Anyway, if you don't like the atomic commit logs at all we can just switch to 
the sourceforge-style script (which exists for a far longer time than sf but 
anyway).