|
From: Tom H. <th...@cy...> - 2003-09-18 07:58:41
|
In message <Pin...@re...>
Nicholas Nethercote <nj...@ca...> wrote:
> I just committed a change to HEAD that does this. I didn't use your
> patch, but instead some similar changes that I'd already made for Massif.
Your commit finally showed up in the public side of the CVS tree
and I just noticed a slight bug - something that was actually in my
patch in fact.
That is that the address reported for the bad instruction is the
value of the eip variable, but that may have been moved - eip_start
is actually the saved value of eip at the start of the instruction.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (th...@cy...)
Software Engineer, Cyberscience Corporation
http://www.cyberscience.com/
|