Re: [Valgrind-developers] Test results, 10 Dec 2002

[Jeremy F. <je...@go...>]

On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 15:35, Julian Seward wrote:
> (mozilla-1.2.1 was looping with memcheck ...)
> 
> 
> > > It all _looks_ plausible.  I'm a bit mystified.  You sure this j[n]p
> > > trick in 69- has no strange side-effects?  I can't think of any.  Perhaps
> > > this is a red herring.
> >
> > Looks OK to me, but its a bit hard to tell without seeing the original
> > code.
> >
> > What happens if you change it back to the popf slow path?  Still happen?
> 
> I dunno; I removed the popf stuff.
> 
> However, backing out 69- makes it work properly.

Try the attached (74-paranoid-flags) with 69- still applied see if it
helps (try with --paranoid-flags=yes and no).  I also found some code
passing the old args to new_emit, which may have been causing a problem.

	J