|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2002-12-01 02:02:50
|
> Great. How about the multiply patch? Maybe, but is not high priority. We'll see. > > chainings, # unchainings, and # of jumps via the dispatcher. It gives a > > worst-case indirect count of about 16% for KDE apps. > > Statically or dynamically? Dynamically. > > * you had VG_MAX_JUMPS set to 4; almost all bbs have 2 or less > > jumps. Is there a reason for having it at 4? I changed it to 2. > > Seems to work; it that OK ? Saved 1 word per TCEntry compared with 4. > > Initially it wouldn't work unless every BB had VG_MAX_JUMPS or fewer > jumpsites. I added the sanity check to generate the fallback path later > on. Ha, good point. > > Next on my hit list is 51-kill-inceip. > > So you've decided to go with the SYNCEIP idea? Well, something definitely needs to be improved here, and SYNCEIP seems a plausible start point, so I want to look at it. J |