From: Petr V. <pv...@su...> - 2025-05-16 12:22:23
|
Hi Mark, > Hi Petr, Hi Cyril, > On Fri, 2025-05-16 at 14:09 +0200, Petr Vorel wrote: > > > On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 10:45:50AM +0200, Cyril Hrubis wrote: > > > > > valgrind-developers has heavy traffic, use valgrind-announce. > > > > Was this requested by valgrind devs? I suppose this is fine as long as > > > > we get their ack. > > > I think valgrind-developers is a better place for announcing new > > > versions of LTP. We can then update our own valgrind testing. > > > valgrind-announce is really for users when valgrind itself has a new > > > release. > > Sure, let's keep valgrind-developers. Thanks for feedback. > > I would consider it disturbing for myself to need to subscribe on > > valgrind-developers before the release and unsubscribe then, but > > it's Cyril who is going to send the announcement mail anyway. > You don't really need to subscribe tp valgrind-developers. If you > aren't subscribed then the message goes to moderation and will normally > be approved within a day (and the sender is normally added to the > approved list). I think this is similar to the ltp list (I am not > subscribed, but seem able to post anyway). Great, we can rely on you looking at the "pending moderator requests". This is also maintained on our side, mostly by Cyril. When I notice valid mail (there is a lot of spam of course) I approve the sender to be able to send without a subscription. I got used to mailing lists on lore.kernel.org to which one can post without any subscription. Also kernel developers got used to it (as they often send to LTP ML without a subscription). But I'm never sure if the "pending moderator requests" on other MLs is actively monitored. Kind regards, Petr > Cheers, > Mark |