From: Florian K. <fk...@so...> - 2025-03-10 12:37:30
|
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=valgrind.git;h=1d9cca850c5401784fe389b6792cb23c803d6342 commit 1d9cca850c5401784fe389b6792cb23c803d6342 Author: Florian Krohm <fl...@ei...> Date: Mon Mar 10 12:36:21 2025 +0000 s390x: disasm-test: Fix thinko Remove verbiage about limited support for opcodes with optional operands. Optional operands are of no concern for disassembly. The reason is that disassembly sees as its input only a sequence of bytes which have no indication as to whether some of its bits were explicitly specified or not. We're testing the disassembler here - not the assembler. Diff: --- none/tests/s390x/disasm-test/README | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/none/tests/s390x/disasm-test/README b/none/tests/s390x/disasm-test/README index 54df05cf98..a771c41c98 100644 --- a/none/tests/s390x/disasm-test/README +++ b/none/tests/s390x/disasm-test/README @@ -169,10 +169,6 @@ Status Only opcodes with extended mnemonics as identified in Appendix J of the Principles of Operation are considered. -There is only partial support for opcodes with optional operands. -In the sense that the generated testcases will always include the -optional operand. - TODO ---- |