From: Mark W. <ma...@kl...> - 2024-12-22 20:28:38
|
Hi Florian, On Sun, Dec 22, 2024 at 11:06:04AM +0100, Florian Krohm wrote: > On 21.12.24 23:01, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > > >No objection. It looks correct. I was just wondering why make > >distcheck didn't detect it. > > The reason could be that make distcheck is run on demand only. ? > I think it would be good to run make distcheck as part of > post_regtest_checks. > That way we'd catch the problem early on in the nightly runs. > Doing so implies, though, that you have xml machinery installed > which is not universally so. There is at least one buildbot that includes make distcheck. https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/valgrind-fedora-x86_64 (But that did have zstd-devel installed so...) > >But if you have zstd devel headers > >installed the build will pick up the /usr/include/zstd.h variant. > > Interesting. So, ideally, make distcheck ought to run on a machine > where these headers are not installed. Or maybe we should rename the internal copy to vg-zstd.h ? Cheers, Mark |