From: Carl L. <ce...@li...> - 2024-10-29 15:08:06
|
Paul: On 10/29/24 12:38 AM, Paul Floyd via Valgrind-developers wrote: > > > On 28-10-24 19:52, Carl Love via Valgrind-developers wrote: >> Mark: >> >> PowerPC testing on Power 8, I am seeing 4 additional stderr failures >> versus Valgrind 3.23.0.RC2 > >> none/tests/fdleak_cmsg_supp (stderr) New for >> Valgrind-3.24.0.RC1 >> none/tests/fdleak_cmsg_xml (stderr) New for >> Valgrind-3.24.0.RC1 >> none/tests/fdleak_ipv4_xml (stderr) New for >> Valgrind-3.24.0.RC1 >> none/tests/socket_close_xml (stderr) New for >> Valgrind-3.24.0.RC1 > > Hi Carl > > It's probably not too serious. The fdleak feature tends to output > messages that are highly system dependent and need plenty of filtering > in order to have stable regtest results. Thanks for the feedback. The tests were run on various lab machines at IBM. I will note that the nightly regression runs on the GCC pool machines gcc110 and gcc112 do not have the same failures. I don't think these failures are an issue for delaying the next release. I agree they do appear to be fairly minor. I will try and get to investigating them soon. Thanks. Carl |