From: Carl L. <ce...@li...> - 2024-10-28 19:59:47
|
Mark: PowerPC testing on Power 8, I am seeing 4 additional stderr failures versus Valgrind 3.23.0.RC2 == 749 tests, 7 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 13 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == gdbserver_tests/hginfo (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/mcblocklistsearch (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/mcbreak (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/mcclean_after_fork (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/mcinfcallWSRU (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/mcleak (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/mcmain_pic (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/mcvabits (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/mssnapshot (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/nlgone_abrt (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/nlgone_exit (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/nlgone_return (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/nlpasssigalrm (stderrB) memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior (stderr) memcheck/tests/linux/rfcomm (stderr) memcheck/tests/linux/sys-execveat (stderr) none/tests/fdleak_cmsg_supp (stderr) New for Valgrind-3.24.0.RC1 none/tests/fdleak_cmsg_xml (stderr) New for Valgrind-3.24.0.RC1 none/tests/fdleak_ipv4_xml (stderr) New for Valgrind-3.24.0.RC1 none/tests/socket_close_xml (stderr) New for Valgrind-3.24.0.RC1 PowerPC testing on Power 9, I am seeing 4 additional stderr failures versus Valgrind 3.23.0.RC2 == 767 tests, 7 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 13 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == gdbserver_tests/hginfo (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/mcblocklistsearch (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/mcbreak (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/mcclean_after_fork (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/mcinfcallWSRU (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/mcleak (stderr) gdbserver_tests/mcleak (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/mcmain_pic (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/mcvabits (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/mssnapshot (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/nlgone_abrt (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/nlgone_exit (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/nlgone_return (stderrB) gdbserver_tests/nlpasssigalrm (stderrB) memcheck/tests/leak-delta (stderr) memcheck/tests/linux/rfcomm (stderr) none/tests/fdleak_cmsg_supp (stderr) New for Valgrind-3.24.0.RC1 none/tests/fdleak_cmsg_xml (stderr) New for Valgrind-3.24.0.RC1 none/tests/fdleak_ipv4_xml (stderr) New for Valgrind-3.24.0.RC1 none/tests/socket_close_xml (stderr) New for Valgrind-3.24.0.RC1 PowerPC testing on Power 10, I am seeing 4 additional stderr failures versus Valgrind 3.23.0.RC2 == 753 tests, 5 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures == memcheck/tests/linux/rfcomm (stderr) none/tests/fdleak_cmsg_supp (stderr) New for Valgrind-3.24.0.RC1 none/tests/fdleak_cmsg_xml (stderr) New for Valgrind-3.24.0.RC1 none/tests/fdleak_ipv4_xml (stderr) New for Valgrind-3.24.0.RC1 none/tests/socket_close_xml (stderr) New for Valgrind-3.24.0.RC1 I am not sure what is going on with these tests. I have not yet been able to dig into them. Carl On 10/27/24 4:58 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > There are still some pending patches, but lets do an RC1 for some > wider testing. > > An RC1 tarball for 3.24.0 is now available at > https://sourceware.org/pub/valgrind/valgrind-3.24.0.RC1.tar.bz2 > (md5sum = a11f33c94dcb0f545a27464934b6fef8) > (sha1sum = b87105b23d3b6d0e212d5729235d0d8225ff8851) > https://sourceware.org/pub/valgrind/valgrind-3.24.0.RC1.tar.bz2.asc > > Please give it a try in configurations that are important for you and > report any problems you have, either on this mailing list, or > (preferably) via our bug tracker at > https://bugs.kde.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=valgrind > > If nothing critical emerges a final release will happen on Thursday 31 > October. > > > _______________________________________________ > Valgrind-users mailing list > Val...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users |