From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2003-07-10 00:38:14
|
Ok, I've just committed to cvs an alternative function-call intercept scheme which works around this, and causes the res_search test case associated with this thread, to work properly on my SuSE 8.2 (glibc-2.3.2) box. So I think it's sorted. J On Wednesday 09 July 2003 21:06, Julian Seward wrote: > On Wednesday 09 July 2003 02:18, Dan Kegel wrote: > > Julian Seward wrote: > > > I guess the only advice I can offer is to avoid glibc-2.3.2 based > > > systems at the moment, and to ask the glibc people to fix this bug > > > (never do PLT bypassing for calls to __errno_location, > > > __h_errno_location or __res_state). > > > > Did you get no response to your earlier message, > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2003-05/msg00145.html > > ? > > No, in a word. > > J > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft > Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. > Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. > www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps > _______________________________________________ > Valgrind-users mailing list > Val...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users |