Re: [Valgrind-users] Suggested changes to corecheck/tests/sigkill.c

[Dan K. <da...@ke...>]

Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> No, we're porting to an almost-SUSv3 compliant system (FreeBSD) where
> strerror/perror does not return "Success" for errno 0, since errno 0 is
> technically not an error and the use of strerror/perror in that situation is
> undefined.

The patch looks good.  I have no objection to it, in fact, it's an improvement
regardless of which OS you run it on.  Apps should not set errno unless
they have a good reason, since at least one earlier version of some standard
didn't allow it... can't recall which...
- Dan

-- 
Dan Kegel
http://www.kegel.com
http://counter.li.org/cgi-bin/runscript/display-person.cgi?user=78045