Re: [Valgrind-users] New experimental skin: signal handler checker

[Nicholas N. <nj...@ca...>]

On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Dan Kegel wrote:

> > But that would be fine, a static checker would be better.
>
> We need both!
>
> Consider the case where you're doing QA on an open source
> project which is huge and hard to compile, and the developers haven't
> seen fit to run the static checker on the whole source base yet.
> Or consider a closed-source app.  In both cases, the dynamic
> checker will work, and the static one won't (because the source is
> hard to get or configure).

Good point.  Three cheers for dynamic binary translation! :)

N