From: Vincent Penquerc'h <Vin...@ar...> - 2003-06-12 09:18:35
|
> replying to an email -- or if they're just scare tactics? Probably mostly scare. It costs nothing. It may also be to protect the company from any loss or perceived loss from any lawsuit from shareholders, who could say the company did not follow due diligence in protecting its information from others. Now, I don't know about the efficiency of it, but it's like spam: it costs nothing, so why not do it, just in case we get a 0.0000000001% benefit from it. -- Vincent Penquerc'h |