From: Nicholas N. <nj...@ca...> - 2003-06-11 21:29:50
|
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Gao, Jiafu wrote: > Totally agree. However, if we can somehow remember the fact (and related > info) when an uninitialized data is moved, and report the info we just > remembered when we actually report such warning (as valgrind does now), it > would be very useful for debug purpose. I don't know how hard, and how much > overhead this would be though. At a guess: quite hard, and a lot of overhead. > This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information > intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If > you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any > disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any > action based on it, is strictly prohibited. Just curious: what law gives this protection? And how/why are the listed actions prohibited? Am I breaking the supposed prohibition by copying the body of the message in my reply? If action based on the email is prohibited, am I breaking the supposed prohibition by even answering it? N |