Re: [Valgrind-users] Error limits with CVS head

[Nicholas N. <nj...@ca...>]

On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Leonard mckinley wrote:

> Really, from a usage perspective, it doesn't matter how many issues
> valgrind detected if it doesn't report any of them because they're
> all suppressed and thus presumably not errors.  I don't think these
> should reduce the number of unsuppressed potential errors that the user
> does get to see.  But I can turn the limits off so that's OK.
> Just a suggestion to make the limits more useful.

From your earlier email:

> In the coregrind_core.html docs, I notice:
>
>    Note that the 300/30000 limits apply after suppressed errors are
>    removed.

Suppressed errors don't count towards the limit.

N