From: Benjamin L. <ben...@re...> - 2003-06-01 20:25:26
|
For what it's worth... ben@dbox:~$ dpkg -s libc6-dev Package: libc6-dev Status: install ok installed Priority: standard Section: libdevel Installed-Size: 11748 Maintainer: GNU Libc Maintainers <deb...@li...> Source: glibc Version: 2.3.1-17 Replaces: man-db (<= 2.3.10-41), gettext (<= 0.10.26-1), ppp (<= 2.2.0f-24), libgdbmg1-dev (<= 1.7.3-24), ldso (<= 1.9.11-9), netkit-rpc, netbase (<< 4.0) Provides: libc-dev Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.1-17) Recommends: c-compiler Suggests: glibc-doc Conflicts: libstdc++2.10-dev (<< 1:2.95.2-15), gcc-2.95 (<< 1:2.95.3-9), libpthread0-dev, libdl1-dev, libdb1-dev, libgdbm1-dev, libc6-dev (<< 2.0.110-1), locales (<< 2.1.3-5), libstdc++2.9-dev, netkit-rpc, libc-dev Description: GNU C Library: Development Libraries and Header Files. Contains the symlinks, headers, and object files needed to compile and link programs which use the standard C library. ben@dbox:~$ grep 252 /usr/include/asm/unistd.h #define __NR_exit_group 252 ben@dbox:~$ ben@dbox:~/cvsremote/valgrind$ uname -a Linux dbox 2.4.20-3-386 #1 Sun May 18 18:18:12 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux ben@dbox:~/cvsremote/valgrind$ This box just compiled the latest CVS version, no problemo. Good luck. Cheers, Ben. On Monday, 2003-06-02 at 06:07:49 AM, Benjamin Lee scribbled: > Another guess... maybe the compile was using the wrong kernel headers? > > On Monday, 2003-06-02 at 05:26:49 AM, Michael Vanier scribbled: > > > > Curious... I *tried* to do that but gave up after many attempts and went > > back to 2.4.17 (at least I thought so...). Anyway, thanks for the advice. > > > > Mike > > > > > From: Benjamin Lee <ben...@re...> > > > Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 05:03:52 +1000 > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > The new syscall __NR_exit_group / 252 was added to kernel 2.4.20. I'd guess > > > you probably just upgraded your Debian Linux kernel from 2.4.18 to 2.4.20 > > > using sid/unstable. > > > > > > Roll yourself a valgrind from CVS and you'll be fine. > > > > > > On Sunday, 2003-06-01 at 07:42:43 PM, Michael Vanier scribbled: > > > > > > > > I just upgraded my valgrind installation to 1.9.6 from 1.9.5, and I > > > > immediately ran into a major problem. I can't run valgrind any more > > > > because of a missing system call. To add insult to injury, the number of > > > > the call (252) is not listed in /usr/include/asm/unistd.h. Recompiling > > > > 1.9.5 fails as well with the same message, so presumably it's happening > > > > because the version of gcc/g++ I'm using has changed (I'm running gcc/g++ > > > > 3.2.3 on a Debian Linux system). Any advice/hints? > > > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > -- > Benjamin Lee > Melbourne, Australia "Always real." http://realthought.net/ > > __________________________________________________________________________ > Real Users know your home telephone number. -- Benjamin Lee Melbourne, Australia "Always real." http://realthought.net/ __________________________________________________________________________ Real Users know your home telephone number. |