From: Benjamin L. <ben...@re...> - 2003-06-01 20:08:03
|
Another guess... maybe the compile was using the wrong kernel headers? On Monday, 2003-06-02 at 05:26:49 AM, Michael Vanier scribbled: > > Curious... I *tried* to do that but gave up after many attempts and went > back to 2.4.17 (at least I thought so...). Anyway, thanks for the advice. > > Mike > > > From: Benjamin Lee <ben...@re...> > > Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 05:03:52 +1000 > > > > Hi, > > > > The new syscall __NR_exit_group / 252 was added to kernel 2.4.20. I'd guess > > you probably just upgraded your Debian Linux kernel from 2.4.18 to 2.4.20 > > using sid/unstable. > > > > Roll yourself a valgrind from CVS and you'll be fine. > > > > On Sunday, 2003-06-01 at 07:42:43 PM, Michael Vanier scribbled: > > > > > > I just upgraded my valgrind installation to 1.9.6 from 1.9.5, and I > > > immediately ran into a major problem. I can't run valgrind any more > > > because of a missing system call. To add insult to injury, the number of > > > the call (252) is not listed in /usr/include/asm/unistd.h. Recompiling > > > 1.9.5 fails as well with the same message, so presumably it's happening > > > because the version of gcc/g++ I'm using has changed (I'm running gcc/g++ > > > 3.2.3 on a Debian Linux system). Any advice/hints? > > > > > > Mike > > > > > -- Benjamin Lee Melbourne, Australia "Always real." http://realthought.net/ __________________________________________________________________________ Real Users know your home telephone number. |