From: Jeremy F. <je...@go...> - 2003-05-30 06:53:39
|
On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 18:09, Andraz Tori wrote: > The problem is that main maintainer has... mildly said ... strange > attitutde towards any external work done. to my experience he would > never accept external patch to fix this. Ah well, that's unfortunate. > Thanks ! But aren't condvars slower than mutexes? (i would imagine) Don't know; I've never measured them. But that's unimportant if mutexes are the wrong mechanism to use. > here it is, relevant part of the log file... > mutex 0x41a9f2a4 is being unlocked, and perror says successefuly, on the > next usage it blocks on lock... OK, we should make valgrind mutexes more picky. J |