From: Dan K. <da...@ke...> - 2003-05-15 04:07:17
|
Julian Seward wrote: >>This is why wine now deliberately writes a jmp instruction over the >>first instruction of glibc's internal errno address getting routine >>so that it guarantee to get control at that point... > > > Well, I've peered at glibc-2.3.2 internals regarding errno and concluded > that it's a *$%*£@ nightmare. > > Perhaps Wine's brute-force solution is a better way. > > So I peered at the sources for wine-20030508 (a snapshot from a > couple of days ago). But after some greppery I cannot find the place > where this patching is done. Can you point me in the right place? Before you do this, could you check with the libc-alpha mailing list and see what Ulrich Dreper has to say about the best way to address the issue? Can't hurt... - Dan -- Dan Kegel http://www.kegel.com http://counter.li.org/cgi-bin/runscript/display-person.cgi?user=78045 |