RE: [Valgrind-users] not understanding some valgrind errors against afs...

[Neulinger, N. <nn...@um...>]

> Or how behaves the LWP lib of AFS on stack overflows? If it=20
> uses mprotect()=20
> for manual stack growing, we can track this, too.

I'm pretty sure it behaves really badly. The stack switching I believe
is fairly limited, and is being used to implement threads. The
application is responsible for requesting a large enough stack to handle
it's deepest nesting of calls. Since it's a server, and fairly
predictable, that isn't usually a problem.

-- Nathan