Re: [Valgrind-users] Strange behaviour with both 1.9.x and 1.0.x

[Jeremy F. <je...@go...>]

Quoting Sebastian <sc...@nb...>:

> This code looks correct to me. 'rand_fd' leads to /dev/urandom, so to
> valgrind it should just look like if 'tmp' is defined by the read(), and
> the
> return value defined by the modulo operation.

Only if you're sure that max is defined.  Try scattering some 
VALGRIND_CHECK_DEFINED()s around to see what is actually a defined value where.

BTW, this won't generate an even distribution from 0...max if that's what you 
need.

    J