[Valgrind-users] Here's a nano-FAQ

[Julian S. <js...@ac...>]

Something to get started with ... here's a nano-FAQ I assembled for
the 1.0.X branch but didn't get round to putting in the 2.0.X branch
yet.  Maybe the FAQ will grow as a result of this list.

J

--------------------------------------------------------------------


A mini-FAQ for valgrind, versions 1.0.4 and 1.1.0
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Last revised 13 Oct 2002
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Q1. Programs run OK on valgrind, but at exit produce a bunch
    of errors a bit like this

    ==20755== Invalid read of size 4
    ==20755==    at 0x40281C8A: _nl_unload_locale (loadlocale.c:238)
    ==20755==    by 0x4028179D: free_mem (findlocale.c:257)
    ==20755==    by 0x402E0962: __libc_freeres (set-freeres.c:34)
    ==20755==    by 0x40048DCC: vgPlain___libc_freeres_wrapper
                                              (vg_clientfuncs.c:585)
    ==20755==    Address 0x40CC304C is 8 bytes inside a block of size 380 
free'd
    ==20755==    at 0x400484C9: free (vg_clientfuncs.c:180)
    ==20755==    by 0x40281CBA: _nl_unload_locale (loadlocale.c:246)
    ==20755==    by 0x40281218: free_mem (setlocale.c:461)
    ==20755==    by 0x402E0962: __libc_freeres (set-freeres.c:34)

    and then die with a segmentation fault.

A1. When the program exits, valgrind runs the procedure
    __libc_freeres() in glibc.  This is a hook for memory debuggers,
    so they can ask glibc to free up any memory it has used.  Doing
    that is needed to ensure that valgrind doesn't incorrectly
    report space leaks in glibc.

    Problem is that running __libc_freeres() in older glibc versions
    causes this crash.

    WORKAROUND FOR 1.0.X versions of valgrind: The simple fix is to
    find in valgrind's sources, the one and only call to
    __libc_freeres() and comment it out, then rebuild the system.  In
    the 1.0.3 version, this call is on line 584 of vg_clientfuncs.c.
    This may mean you get false reports of space leaks in glibc, but
    it at least avoids the crash.

    WORKAROUND FOR 1.1.X and later versions of valgrind: use the
    --run-libc-freeres=no flag.



Q2. My program dies complaining that syscall 197 is unimplemented.

A2. 197, which is fstat64, is supported by valgrind.  The problem is
    that the /usr/include/asm/unistd.h on the machine on which your
    valgrind was built, doesn't match your kernel -- or, to be more
    specific, glibc is asking your kernel to do a syscall which is
    not listed in /usr/include/asm/unistd.h.

    The fix is simple.  Somewhere near the top of vg_syscall_mem.c,
    add the following line:

       #define __NR_fstat64            197

    Rebuild and try again.  The above line should appear before any
    uses of the __NR_fstat64 symbol in that file.  If you look at the
    place where __NR_fstat64 is used in vg_syscall_mem.c, it will be
    obvious why this fix works.  NOTE for valgrind versions 1.1.0
    and later, the relevant file is actually coregrind/vg_syscalls.c.


Q3. My (buggy) program dies like this:
      valgrind: vg_malloc2.c:442 (bszW_to_pszW):
                Assertion `pszW >= 0' failed.
    And/or my (buggy) program runs OK on valgrind, but dies like
    this on cachegrind.

A3. If valgrind shows any invalid reads, invalid writes and invalid
    frees in your program, the above may happen.  Reason is that your
    program may trash valgrind's low-level memory manager, which then
    dies with the above assertion, or something like this.  The cure
    is to fix your program so that it doesn't do any illegal memory
    accesses.  The above failure will hopefully go away after that.


Q4. I'm running Red Hat Advanced Server.  Valgrind always segfaults at
    startup.

A4. [Note: fixed properly in 1.9.4; the following stuff is now redundant]

    Known issue with RHAS 2.1.  The following kludge works, but
    is too gruesome to put in the sources permanently.  Try it.
    Last verified as working on RHAS 2.1 at 20021008.

    Find the following comment in vg_main.c -- in 1.0.4 this is at
    line 636:

       /* we locate: NEW_AUX_ENT(1, AT_PAGESZ, ELF_EXEC_PAGESIZE) in
          the elf interpreter table */

    Immediately _before_ this comment add the following:

       /* HACK for R H Advanced server.  Ignore all the above and
          start the search 18 pages below the "obvious" start point.
          God knows why.  Seems like we can't go into the highest 18
          pages of the stack.  This is not good! -- the 18 pages is
          determined just by looking for the highest proddable
          address.  It would be nice to see some kernel or libc or
          something code to justify this.  */

       /* 0xBFFEE000 is 0xC0000000 - 18 pages */
       sp = 0xBFFEE000;

       /* end of HACK for R H Advanced server. */

    Obviously the assignment to sp is the only important line.


(this is the end of the FAQ.)