|
From: Carl L. <ce...@us...> - 2023-04-27 16:47:56
|
On Thu, 2023-04-27 at 18:29 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi Carl, > > <snip> > > The test failures on Power 10 that I saw on one of the Power 10 > > systems > > was fixed, as expected. > > > > I see the following on both Power 10 systems. > > > > == 714 tests, 2 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB > > failures, > > 0 stdoutB failures, 2 post failures == > > memcheck/tests/bug340392 (stderr) > > memcheck/tests/linux/rfcomm (stderr) > > massif/tests/new-cpp (post) > > massif/tests/overloaded-new (post) > > So pretty close to zero fail. > > bug340392 is mentioned as failing for ppc64 in in > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=352364 I wonder if we can mark > it > known-fail/ignore with a reference to that bug? I read thru the bugzilla. I have never delved into this bug. From the sounds, this is very PPC specific. The effort to make this comparison highly accurate is not trivial. The bug has been around for 8 years and other than this test, no one seems to have needed the really high level of accuracy in the comparison. So, yea, I would be fine as marking this as a known fail and reference the bug. Carl |