From: Nicholas N. <n.n...@gm...> - 2023-04-04 10:11:36
|
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 at 19:24, David Faure <fa...@kd...> wrote: > > But then, with no cache simulation and no call stacks, what's left in > `cachegrind --cache-sim=no`? > >From the email that started this thread: If you run with `--cache-sim=no` then the cache simulation is disabled and > you just get one event: Ir. (This is "instruction cache reads", which is > equivalent to "instructions executed".) > |