|
From: <ma...@gc...> - 2023-03-08 08:29:24
|
valgrind revision: valgrind-3.21.0.GIT-2fa68c1cc7-20230307
C compiler: gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.4) 4.8.4
GDB: GNU gdb (Ubuntu 7.7.1-0ubuntu5~14.04.3) 7.7.1
Assembler: GNU assembler (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.24
C library: GNU C Library (Ubuntu EGLIBC 2.19-0ubuntu6.15) stable release version 2.19
uname -mrs: Linux 3.13.0-170-generic aarch64
Vendor version: Ubuntu 14.04.6 LTS, Trusty Tahr
Nightly build on gcc114-arm64 ( Ubuntu 14.04 trusty aarch64 )
Started at 2023-03-08 00:00:01 PST
Ended at 2023-03-08 00:29:13 PST
Results differ from 24 hours ago
Checking out Valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 652 tests, 19 stderr failures, 4 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 1 stdoutB failure, 0 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/hginfo (stderrB)
gdbserver_tests/hgtls (stdoutB)
memcheck/tests/dw4 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/memalign_args (stderr)
memcheck/tests/sigaltstack (stderr)
memcheck/tests/supp_unknown (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo3 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo4 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo5 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinforestrict (stderr)
helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr)
drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr)
drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
none/tests/bigcode (stdout)
none/tests/bigcode (stderr)
none/tests/map_unmap (stdout)
none/tests/map_unmap (stderr)
none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stdout)
none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stderr)
none/tests/stackgrowth (stdout)
none/tests/stackgrowth (stderr)
Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo
memcheck/tests/varinfo5 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinforestrict (stderr)
helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr)
drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr)
drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
none/tests/bigcode (stdout)
none/tests/bigcode (stderr)
none/tests/map_unmap (stdout)
none/tests/map_unmap (stderr)
none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stdout)
none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stderr)
none/tests/stackgrowth (stdout)
none/tests/stackgrowth (stderr)
...checking makefile consistency
...checking header files and include directives
make: *** [regtest] Error 1
=================================================
== Results from 24 hours ago ==
=================================================
Checking out Valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... failed
Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo
m_replacemalloc/vg_replace_malloc.c:1312:2: note: in expansion of macro âDELETE_ALIGNEDâ
DELETE_ALIGNED(SO_SYN_MALLOC, _ZdaPvSt11align_val_tRKSt9nothrow_t, __builtin_vec_delete_aligned );
^
m_replacemalloc/vg_replace_malloc.c:1012:64: error: unknown type name âsize_tâ
void VG_REPLACE_FUNCTION_EZU(10050,soname,fnname) (void *p, size_t alignment) \
^
m_replacemalloc/vg_replace_malloc.c:1312:2: note: in expansion of macro âDELETE_ALIGNEDâ
DELETE_ALIGNED(SO_SYN_MALLOC, _ZdaPvSt11align_val_tRKSt9nothrow_t, __builtin_vec_delete_aligned );
^
make[3]: *** [m_replacemalloc/libreplacemalloc_toolpreload_arm64_linux_a-vg_replace_malloc.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
mv -f .deps/valgrind-launcher-linux.Tpo .deps/valgrind-launcher-linux.Po
mv -f .deps/libcoregrind_arm64_linux_a-m_transtab.Tpo .deps/libcoregrind_arm64_linux_a-m_transtab.Po
mv -f .deps/valgrind-m_debuglog.Tpo .deps/valgrind-m_debuglog.Po
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/mark/valgrind-nightly/nightly/valgrind-old/coregrind'
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/mark/valgrind-nightly/nightly/valgrind-old/coregrind'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/mark/valgrind-nightly/nightly/valgrind-old'
make: *** [all] Error 2
=================================================
== Difference between 24 hours ago and now ==
=================================================
*** old.short 2023-03-08 00:03:26.015226560 -0800
--- new.short 2023-03-08 00:29:13.106331983 -0800
***************
*** 3,26 ****
Configuring valgrind ... done
! Building valgrind ... failed
Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo
! m_replacemalloc/vg_replace_malloc.c:1312:2: note: in expansion of macro âDELETE_ALIGNEDâ
! DELETE_ALIGNED(SO_SYN_MALLOC, _ZdaPvSt11align_val_tRKSt9nothrow_t, __builtin_vec_delete_aligned );
! ^
! m_replacemalloc/vg_replace_malloc.c:1012:64: error: unknown type name âsize_tâ
! void VG_REPLACE_FUNCTION_EZU(10050,soname,fnname) (void *p, size_t alignment) \
! ^
! m_replacemalloc/vg_replace_malloc.c:1312:2: note: in expansion of macro âDELETE_ALIGNEDâ
! DELETE_ALIGNED(SO_SYN_MALLOC, _ZdaPvSt11align_val_tRKSt9nothrow_t, __builtin_vec_delete_aligned );
! ^
! make[3]: *** [m_replacemalloc/libreplacemalloc_toolpreload_arm64_linux_a-vg_replace_malloc.o] Error 1
! make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
! mv -f .deps/valgrind-launcher-linux.Tpo .deps/valgrind-launcher-linux.Po
! mv -f .deps/libcoregrind_arm64_linux_a-m_transtab.Tpo .deps/libcoregrind_arm64_linux_a-m_transtab.Po
! mv -f .deps/valgrind-m_debuglog.Tpo .deps/valgrind-m_debuglog.Po
! make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/mark/valgrind-nightly/nightly/valgrind-old/coregrind'
! make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
! make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/mark/valgrind-nightly/nightly/valgrind-old/coregrind'
! make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
! make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/mark/valgrind-nightly/nightly/valgrind-old'
! make: *** [all] Error 2
--- 3,57 ----
Configuring valgrind ... done
! Building valgrind ... done
! Running regression tests ... failed
!
! Regression test results follow
!
! == 652 tests, 19 stderr failures, 4 stdout failures, 1 stderrB failure, 1 stdoutB failure, 0 post failures ==
! gdbserver_tests/hginfo (stderrB)
! gdbserver_tests/hgtls (stdoutB)
! memcheck/tests/dw4 (stderr)
! memcheck/tests/memalign_args (stderr)
! memcheck/tests/sigaltstack (stderr)
! memcheck/tests/supp_unknown (stderr)
! memcheck/tests/varinfo2 (stderr)
! memcheck/tests/varinfo3 (stderr)
! memcheck/tests/varinfo4 (stderr)
! memcheck/tests/varinfo5 (stderr)
! memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr)
! memcheck/tests/varinforestrict (stderr)
! helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr)
! helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr)
! drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr)
! drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr)
! drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
! none/tests/bigcode (stdout)
! none/tests/bigcode (stderr)
! none/tests/map_unmap (stdout)
! none/tests/map_unmap (stderr)
! none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stdout)
! none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stderr)
! none/tests/stackgrowth (stdout)
! none/tests/stackgrowth (stderr)
!
Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo
! memcheck/tests/varinfo5 (stderr)
! memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr)
! memcheck/tests/varinforestrict (stderr)
! helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr)
! helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr)
! drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr)
! drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr)
! drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
! none/tests/bigcode (stdout)
! none/tests/bigcode (stderr)
! none/tests/map_unmap (stdout)
! none/tests/map_unmap (stderr)
! none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stdout)
! none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stderr)
! none/tests/stackgrowth (stdout)
! none/tests/stackgrowth (stderr)
!
! ...checking makefile consistency
! ...checking header files and include directives
! make: *** [regtest] Error 1
--tools=none,memcheck,callgrind,helgrind,cachegrind,drd,massif --reps=3 --vg=../valgrind-new --vg=../valgrind-old
-- Running tests in perf ----------------------------------------------
-- bigcode1 --
vg_perf: '/home/mark/valgrind-nightly/nightly/valgrind-new/../valgrind-old/./coregrind/valgrind' not found or not a file (/home/mark/valgrind-nightly/nightly/valgrind-new/../valgrind-old)
Command exited with non-zero status 2
0.63user 0.01system 0:00.66elapsed 96%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 6676maxresident)k
0inputs+80outputs (0major+9672minor)pagefaults 0swaps
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_mutex_signal.stderr.exp 2023-03-08 00:03:26.415188104 -0800
+++ pth_mutex_signal.stderr.out 2023-03-08 00:23:16.050845970 -0800
@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@
thread created
sleeping
signalling
-sleeping
nullHandler running
+sleeping
unlocking
contender locked mutex
contender unlocking mutex
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-ppc
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-ppc 2023-03-08 00:03:26.405189065 -0800
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2023-03-08 00:25:37.317194878 -0800
@@ -7,28 +7,20 @@
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:20)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+ at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:47)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+ at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-s390
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-s390 2023-03-08 00:03:26.405189065 -0800
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2023-03-08 00:25:37.317194878 -0800
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
- by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-x86
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-x86 2023-03-08 00:03:26.415188104 -0800
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2023-03-08 00:25:37.317194878 -0800
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
@@ -16,19 +16,11 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-freebsd
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-freebsd 2023-03-08 00:03:26.425187143 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2023-03-08 00:25:42.636680510 -0800
@@ -19,9 +19,14 @@
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 1:
+The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
+
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
@@ -37,13 +42,10 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 6 errors from 5 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-freebsd-clang
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-freebsd-clang 2023-03-08 00:03:26.415188104 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2023-03-08 00:25:42.636680510 -0800
@@ -19,9 +19,14 @@
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 1:
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:39)
+The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
+
+Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
+ at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
@@ -37,13 +42,10 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:39)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
+ by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 6 errors from 5 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc2.8
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc2.8 2023-03-08 00:03:26.415188104 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2023-03-08 00:25:42.636680510 -0800
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: (below main)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-ppc
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-ppc 2023-03-08 00:03:26.415188104 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2023-03-08 00:25:42.636680510 -0800
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
+ at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-s390
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-s390 2023-03-08 00:03:26.415188104 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2023-03-08 00:25:42.636680510 -0800
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-solaris
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-solaris 2023-03-08 00:03:26.405189065 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2023-03-08 00:25:42.636680510 -0800
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 2:
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
@@ -15,19 +16,21 @@
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Thread 1:
The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:5)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
---------------------
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 1.
@@ -37,18 +40,12 @@
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:24)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-x86
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-x86 2023-03-08 00:03:26.415188104 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2023-03-08 00:25:42.636680510 -0800
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:52)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:43)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:48)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:53)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/hginfo.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- hginfo.stderrB.exp 2023-03-08 00:03:26.295199641 -0800
+++ hginfo.stderrB.out 2023-03-08 00:09:45.898705452 -0800
@@ -11,6 +11,10 @@
...
Block was alloc'd by thread #x
Lock ga 0x........ {
+ Address 0x........ is 2440 bytes inside data symbol "_rtld_local"
+ kind mbRec
+}
+Lock ga 0x........ {
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "mx"
kind mbRec
{ W1:thread #x tid #x }
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/hgtls.stdoutB.diff
=================================================
--- hgtls.stdoutB.exp 2023-03-08 00:03:26.295199641 -0800
+++ hgtls.stdoutB.out 2023-03-08 00:09:49.348373848 -0800
@@ -8,38 +8,8 @@
test race tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
55 int here = 0;
-test local tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test local tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test global tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test global tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test static_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test static_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_local tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_local tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_global tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_global tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Program exited normally.
+A debugging session is active.
+ Inferior 1 [Remote target] will be detached.
+Quit anyway? (y or n) [answered Y; input not from terminal]
+Detaching from program: /home/mark/valgrind-nightly/nightly/valgrind-new/none/tests/tls, Remote target
+Ending remote debugging.
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg05_race2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg05_race2.stderr.exp 2023-03-08 00:03:26.575172722 -0800
+++ hg05_race2.stderr.out 2023-03-08 00:16:50.667878876 -0800
@@ -26,8 +26,7 @@
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside foo.poot[5].plop[11],
- declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -42,8 +41,7 @@
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside foo.poot[5].plop[11],
- declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp 2023-03-08 00:03:26.565173683 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2023-03-08 00:18:12.580007014 -0800
@@ -169,8 +169,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:57, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(1) no error on next line
@@ -187,8 +187,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(4) no error on next line
@@ -207,8 +207,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-glibc-2.18
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-glibc-2.18 2023-03-08 00:03:26.565173683 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2023-03-08 00:18:12.580007014 -0800
@@ -57,6 +57,14 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_destroy failed
+ with error code 16 (EBUSY: Device or resource busy)
+ at 0x........: mutex_destroy_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:117)
+
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_lock failed
with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: mutex_lock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
@@ -157,10 +165,13 @@
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:194)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
+
(1) no error on next line
(2) no error on next line
@@ -172,10 +183,13 @@
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:211)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
+
(4) no error on next line
(5) no error on next line
@@ -187,11 +201,14 @@
Thread #x unlocked a not-locked lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:232)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
@@ -224,6 +241,7 @@
with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:284)
@@ -238,4 +256,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 22 errors from 22 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-glibc-2.21
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-glibc-2.21 2023-03-08 00:03:26.585171760 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2023-03-08 00:18:12.580007014 -0800
@@ -169,8 +169,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:57, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(1) no error on next line
@@ -187,8 +187,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(4) no error on next line
@@ -207,8 +207,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
@@ -235,6 +235,15 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:281)
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:284)
+
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
@@ -247,4 +256,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 22 errors from 22 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-mips32
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-mips32 2023-03-08 00:03:26.575172722 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2023-03-08 00:18:12.580007014 -0800
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_join failed
- with error code 45 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
+ with error code 35 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
at 0x........: pthread_join_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_join (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:93)
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_init failed
- with error code 122 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
+ with error code 95 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:107)
@@ -169,8 +169,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:57, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(1) no error on next line
@@ -187,8 +187,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(4) no error on next line
@@ -207,8 +207,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
@@ -235,6 +235,15 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:281)
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:284)
+
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
@@ -247,4 +256,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 22 errors from 22 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-mips32-b
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-mips32-b 2023-03-08 00:03:26.575172722 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2023-03-08 00:18:12.580007014 -0800
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_join failed
- with error code 45 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
+ with error code 35 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
at 0x........: pthread_join_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_join (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:93)
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_init failed
- with error code 122 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
+ with error code 95 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:107)
@@ -169,8 +169,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:57, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(1) no error on next line
@@ -187,8 +187,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(4) no error on next line
@@ -207,8 +207,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
- with error code 89 (ENOSYS: Function not implemented)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-s390x
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-s390x 2023-03-08 00:03:26.575172722 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2023-03-08 00:18:12.580007014 -0800
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
Thread #x was created
...
- by 0x........: pthread_create_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:86)
@@ -28,9 +27,8 @@
at 0x........: racy_child (tc20_verifywrap.c:44)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
-
-Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprotected"
-declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:37
+ Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprotected"
+ declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:37
----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -167,10 +165,13 @@
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:194)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
+
(1) no error on next line
(2) no error on next line
@@ -182,10 +183,13 @@
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:211)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
+
(4) no error on next line
(5) no error on next line
@@ -199,10 +203,12 @@
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:232)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
@@ -229,6 +235,15 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:281)
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:284)
+
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
@@ -241,4 +256,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 22 errors from 22 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-solaris
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-solaris 2023-03-08 00:03:26.575172722 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2023-03-08 00:18:12.580007014 -0800
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_join failed
- with error code 45 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
+ with error code 35 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
at 0x........: pthread_join_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_join (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:93)
@@ -43,8 +43,8 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to mutex_init failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_init failed
+ with error code 95 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:107)
@@ -57,8 +57,16 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_destroy failed
+ with error code 16 (EBUSY: Device or resource busy)
+ at 0x........: mutex_destroy_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:117)
+
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_lock failed
- with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: mutex_lock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:123)
@@ -66,7 +74,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_trylock failed
- with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: mutex_trylock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_mutex_trylock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:131)
@@ -74,7 +82,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_timedlock failed
- with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: mutex_timedlock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_mutex_timedlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:136)
@@ -89,7 +97,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: mutex_unlock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:140)
@@ -142,7 +150,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_cond_timedwait failed
- with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:180)
@@ -158,22 +166,13 @@
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:194)
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- ...
+ at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside rwl.__pthread_rwlock_readers,
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:57, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_rwlock_unlock failed
- with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- ...
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:194)
-
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/dw4.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- dw4.stderr.exp 2023-03-08 00:03:26.345194834 -0800
+++ dw4.stderr.out 2023-03-08 00:11:33.298381828 -0800
@@ -14,8 +14,8 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (dw4.c:32)
by 0x........: main (dw4.c:62)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local.i,
- declared at dw4.c:51, in frame #1 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #1, created by main (dw4.c:50)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (dw4.c:32)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/dw4.stderr.diff-solaris
=================================================
--- dw4.stderr.exp-solaris 2023-03-08 00:03:26.375191950 -0800
+++ dw4.stderr.out 2023-03-08 00:11:33.298381828 -0800
@@ -14,8 +14,8 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (dw4.c:32)
by 0x........: main (dw4.c:62)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local.i,
- declared at dw4.c:51, in frame #1 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #1, created by main (dw4.c:50)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (dw4.c:32)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/memalign_args.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- memalign_args.stderr.exp 2023-03-08 00:03:26.355193872 -0800
+++ memalign_args.stderr.out 2023-03-08 00:13:00.440005950 -0800
@@ -7,6 +7,10 @@
by 0x........: main (memalign_args.c:16)
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
+ at 0x........: memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (memalign_args.c:16)
+
+Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: posix_memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (memalign_args.c:20)
@@ -19,11 +23,15 @@
by 0x........: main (memalign_args.c:20)
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
- at 0x........: aligned_alloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ at 0x........: memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (memalign_args.c:23)
+
+Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
+ at 0x........: memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (memalign_args.c:23)
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
- at 0x........: aligned_alloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ at 0x........: memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (memalign_args.c:23)
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/memalign_args.stderr.diff-glibc
=================================================
--- memalign_args.stderr.exp-glibc 2023-03-08 00:03:26.355193872 -0800
+++ memalign_args.stderr.out 2023-03-08 00:13:00.440005950 -0800
@@ -7,6 +7,10 @@
by 0x........: main (memalign_args.c:16)
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
+ at 0x........: memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (memalign_args.c:16)
+
+Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: posix_memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (memalign_args.c:20)
@@ -20,6 +24,10 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (memalign_args.c:23)
+
+Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
+ at 0x........: memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (memalign_args.c:23)
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/memalign_args.stderr.diff-ppc64
=================================================
--- memalign_args.stderr.exp-ppc64 2023-03-08 00:03:26.315197718 -0800
+++ memalign_args.stderr.out 2023-03-08 00:13:00.440005950 -0800
@@ -23,10 +23,6 @@
by 0x........: main (memalign_args.c:20)
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
- at 0x........: posix_memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (memalign_args.c:20)
-
-Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at 0x........: memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (memalign_args.c:23)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/sigaltstack.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- sigaltstack.stderr.exp 2023-03-08 00:03:26.385190988 -0800
+++ sigaltstack.stderr.out 2023-03-08 00:13:59.654314626 -0800
@@ -4,3 +4,51 @@
raising the signal
caught signal, local var is on 0x........
done
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid write of size 4
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid write of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid write of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/supp_unknown.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- supp_unknown.stderr.exp 2023-03-08 00:03:26.325196757 -0800
+++ supp_unknown.stderr.out 2023-03-08 00:14:12.633067211 -0800
@@ -1,8 +1,11 @@
+Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
+
Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Access not within mapped region at address 0x........
...
- by 0x........: main (badjump.c:17)
If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
possible), you can try to increase the size of the
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/supp_unknown.stderr.diff-kfail
=================================================
--- supp_unknown.stderr.exp-kfail 2023-03-08 00:03:26.325196757 -0800
+++ supp_unknown.stderr.out 2023-03-08 00:14:12.633067211 -0800
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
+
Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Access not within mapped region at address 0x........
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- varinfo2.stderr.exp 2023-03-08 00:03:26.345194834 -0800
+++ varinfo2.stderr.out 2023-03-08 00:15:00.688448588 -0800
@@ -2,20 +2,20 @@
at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:28)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo2.c:41)
by 0x........: main (varinfo2.c:51)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside var[7],
- declared at varinfo2.c:39, in frame #X of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #X, created by foo (varinfo2.c:36)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:28)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo2.c:43)
by 0x........: main (varinfo2.c:51)
- Location 0x........ is 2 bytes inside var.bar,
- declared at varinfo2.c:42, in frame #X of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #X, created by foo (varinfo2.c:36)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:28)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo2.c:46)
by 0x........: main (varinfo2.c:51)
- Location 0x........ is 1 byte inside local var "var"
- declared at varinfo2.c:37, in frame #X of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #X, created by foo (varinfo2.c:36)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo2.stderr.diff-ppc64
=================================================
--- varinfo2.stderr.exp-ppc64 2023-03-08 00:03:26.375191950 -0800
+++ varinfo2.stderr.out 2023-03-08 00:15:00.688448588 -0800
@@ -1,21 +1,21 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:29)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:28)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo2.c:41)
by 0x........: main (varinfo2.c:51)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside var[7],
- declared at varinfo2.c:39, in frame #X of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #X, created by foo (varinfo2.c:36)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:29)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:28)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo2.c:43)
by 0x........: main (varinfo2.c:51)
- Location 0x........ is 2 bytes inside var.bar,
- declared at varinfo2.c:42, in frame #X of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #X, created by foo (varinfo2.c:36)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:29)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:28)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo2.c:46)
by 0x........: main (varinfo2.c:51)
- Location 0x........ is 1 byte inside local var "var"
- declared at varinfo2.c:37, in frame #X of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #X, created by foo (varinfo2.c:36)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo3.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- varinfo3.stderr.exp 2023-03-08 00:03:26.325196757 -0800
+++ varinfo3.stderr.out 2023-03-08 00:15:04.978036320 -0800
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@
by 0x........: bar (varinfo3.c:43)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo3.c:58)
by 0x........: main (varinfo3.c:66)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside nonstatic_local_def[6],
- declared at varinfo3.c:51, in frame #X of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #X, created by foo (varinfo3.c:49)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (varinfo3.c:28)
@@ -53,6 +53,6 @@
by 0x........: bar (varinfo3.c:45)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo3.c:58)
by 0x........: main (varinfo3.c:66)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside nonstatic_local_undef[8],
- declared at varinfo3.c:53, in frame #X of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #X, created by foo (varinfo3.c:49)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo3.stderr.diff-freebsd
===========================================...
[truncated message content] |