Re: [Valgrind-users] bug report: bugzilla refused to accept this saying it contains spam. But it doesn't.

[John R. <jr...@bi...>]

> I think valgrind experienced a division by zero.
> 
> readdwarf.c:
> 
>        if (op_code >= info.li_opcode_base) {
>           op_code -= info.li_opcode_base;
>           Word adv = (op_code / info.li_line_range)    <--- line 831
>                         * info.li_min_insn_length;
>           Int advAddr = adv;
>           state_machine_regs.address += adv;

If you can re-build valgrind, then a quick-and-dirty work-around
might be

 >           Word adv = (op_code / (info.li_line_range ?: 1))
 >                         * info.li_min_insn_length;

where "x ?: y" is a deprecated-but-useful slang for "x ? x : y".

Also, one probable reason for the bug reporting system rejecting
your first submission is the many consecutive lines that begin with
"00:08.54 GECKO(319869) ".  The work-around for this is to put
the text of the valgrind complaint into an attachment, and say
"See the attachment for the full text of the valgrind complaint."