|
From: Carl L. <ce...@us...> - 2022-04-05 01:53:24
|
Mark:
On Mon, 2022-04-04 at 09:56 -0700, Carl Love wrote:
>
<snip>
>
> I ran the RC1 on Power 8 RHEL7.8, gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat
> 4.8.5-39) with the following results:
>
> == 708 tests, 5 stderr failures, 1 stdout failure, 0 stderrB
> failures,
> 2 stdoutB failures, 1 post failure ==
> gdbserver_tests/nlgone_abrt (stdoutB)
> gdbserver_tests/nlpasssigalrm (stdoutB)
> memcheck/tests/bug340392 (stderr)
> memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior (stderr)
> drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr)
> drd/tests/std_mutex (stderr)
> drd/tests/timed_mutex (stderr)
> none/tests/ppc32/jm_vec_isa_2_07 (stdout)
>
> The jm_vec_isa_2_07 failures is due to a couple of the vpermq tests
> failing. Looks like I didn't run the regression test for the vpermq
> tests on Power 8 BE. I will take a look at these failures today.
I have updated the bugzilla 451827 for the vbpermq re-write with a fix
for the Powerpc 32-bit mode. The fix was retested on all platforms.
No additional regression issues were seen. The Power 8 BE tests now
pass as expected.
== 708 tests, 5 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures,
2 stdoutB failures, 1 post failure ==
gdbserver_tests/nlgone_abrt (stdoutB)
gdbserver_tests/nlpasssigalrm (stdoutB)
memcheck/tests/bug340392 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior (stderr)
drd/tests/pth_mutex_signal (stderr)
drd/tests/std_mutex (stderr)
drd/tests/timed_mutex (stderr)
I think we are good to go on Power.
Carl Love
|