Menu
▾
▴
[Valgrind-testresults] (unchanged) 2020-02-29 00:00:01 PST nightly build (gcc114-arm64, Ubuntu 14.04 trusty aarch64)
|
From: <ma...@gc...> - 2020-02-29 10:26:46
|
valgrind revision: valgrind-3.16.0.GIT-3a2711c659-20200228
C compiler: gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.4) 4.8.4
GDB: GNU gdb (Ubuntu 7.7.1-0ubuntu5~14.04.3) 7.7.1
Assembler: GNU assembler (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.24
C library: GNU C Library (Ubuntu EGLIBC 2.19-0ubuntu6.15) stable release version 2.19
uname -mrs: Linux 3.13.0-92-generic aarch64
Vendor version: Ubuntu 14.04.6 LTS, Trusty Tahr
Nightly build on gcc114-arm64 ( Ubuntu 14.04 trusty aarch64 )
Started at 2020-02-29 00:00:01 PST
Ended at 2020-02-29 02:26:27 PST
Results unchanged from 24 hours ago
Checking out Valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 624 tests, 20 stderr failures, 4 stdout failures, 2 stderrB failures, 2 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/hginfo (stderrB)
gdbserver_tests/hgtls (stdoutB)
gdbserver_tests/mcinfcallWSRU (stderrB)
gdbserver_tests/nlvgdbsigqueue (stdoutB)
memcheck/tests/dw4 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/sigaltstack (stderr)
memcheck/tests/supp_unknown (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo1 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo2 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo3 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo4 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo5 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinforestrict (stderr)
helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr)
drd/tests/std_mutex (stderr)
drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr)
drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
none/tests/bigcode (stdout)
none/tests/bigcode (stderr)
none/tests/map_unmap (stdout)
none/tests/map_unmap (stderr)
none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stdout)
none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stderr)
none/tests/stackgrowth (stdout)
none/tests/stackgrowth (stderr)
Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo
memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinforestrict (stderr)
helgrind/tests/hg05_race2 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr)
drd/tests/std_mutex (stderr)
drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr)
drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
none/tests/bigcode (stdout)
none/tests/bigcode (stderr)
none/tests/map_unmap (stdout)
none/tests/map_unmap (stderr)
none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stdout)
none/tests/sigstackgrowth (stderr)
none/tests/stackgrowth (stdout)
none/tests/stackgrowth (stderr)
...checking makefile consistency
...checking header files and include directives
make: *** [regtest] Error 1
--tools=none,memcheck,callgrind,helgrind,cachegrind,drd,massif --reps=3 --vg=../valgrind-new --vg=../valgrind-old
-- Running tests in perf ----------------------------------------------
-- bigcode1 --
bigcode1 valgrind-new:0.20s no: 3.9s (19.6x, -----) me: 7.1s (35.4x, -----) ca:35.5s (177.3x, -----) he: 4.4s (22.1x, -----) ca: 9.9s (49.3x, -----) dr: 4.4s (21.8x, -----) ma: 4.7s (23.7x, -----)
bigcode1 valgrind-old:0.20s no: 3.9s (19.6x, -0.3%) me: 7.0s (35.2x, 0.4%) ca:35.6s (177.8x, -0.3%) he: 4.4s (22.2x, -0.7%) ca: 9.8s (49.1x, 0.4%) dr: 4.4s (21.8x, 0.0%) ma: 4.7s (23.5x, 0.4%)
-- bigcode2 --
bigcode2 valgrind-new:0.21s no:10.3s (48.9x, -----) me:18.9s (90.1x, -----) ca:65.0s (309.3x, -----) he:11.8s (56.4x, -----) ca:17.8s (84.9x, -----) dr:11.3s (53.9x, -----) ma:11.8s (56.3x, -----)
bigcode2 valgrind-old:0.21s no:10.3s (49.2x, -0.7%) me:19.0s (90.4x, -0.3%) ca:67.0s (319.0x, -3.1%) he:12.4s (59.0x, -4.6%) ca:18.5s (88.0x, -3.7%) dr:12.8s (60.7x,-12.6%) ma:12.0s (57.0x, -1.2%)
-- bz2 --
bz2 valgrind-new:1.12s no: 4.0s ( 3.6x, -----) me:14.6s (13.0x, -----) ca:40.9s (36.6x, -----) he:20.8s (18.5x, -----) ca:31.5s (28.1x, -----) dr:29.5s (26.4x, -----) ma: 4.4s ( 3.9x, -----)
bz2 valgrind-old:1.12s no: 4.2s ( 3.7x, -3.7%) me:14.8s (13.2x, -1.4%) ca:42.0s (37.5x, -2.5%) he:21.1s (18.9x, -1.9%) ca:31.4s (28.1x, 0.2%) dr:29.6s (26.4x, -0.2%) ma: 4.3s ( 3.9x, 1.4%)
-- fbench --
fbench valgrind-new:0.54s no: 4.3s ( 7.9x, -----) me: 9.6s (17.7x, -----) ca:17.0s (31.5x, -----) he: 6.9s (12.8x, -----) ca:11.0s (20.3x, -----) dr: 8.2s (15.2x, -----) ma: 4.5s ( 8.2x, -----)
fbench valgrind-old:0.54s no: 4.2s ( 7.7x, 2.6%) me: 8.4s (15.6x, 12.0%) ca:17.1s (31.7x, -0.5%) he: 6.9s (12.9x, -0.3%) ca:11.0s (20.4x, -0.5%) dr: 8.1s (15.1x, 0.9%) ma: 4.3s ( 8.0x, 2.5%)
-- ffbench --
ffbench valgrind-new:0.52s no: 2.9s ( 5.5x, -----) me: 5.6s (10.8x, -----) ca: 6.1s (11.7x, -----) he:18.2s (35.1x, -----) ca:11.1s (21.3x, -----) dr:10.1s (19.4x, -----) ma: 3.1s ( 6.0x, -----)
ffbench valgrind-old:0.52s no: 3.0s ( 5.8x, -4.9%) me: 5.7s (11.0x, -1.8%) ca: 6.0s (11.6x, 1.0%) he:14.7s (28.3x, 19.3%) ca:10.7s (20.5x, 3.9%) dr: 9.8s (18.9x, 2.7%) ma: 3.1s ( 6.0x, 0.3%)
-- heap --
heap valgrind-new:0.53s no: 2.5s ( 4.8x, -----) me:11.4s (21.4x, -----) ca:22.8s (43.0x, -----) he:17.0s (32.0x, -----) ca:13.0s (24.5x, -----) dr:10.2s (19.3x, -----) ma: 6.1s (11.5x, -----)
heap valgrind-old:0.53s no: 2.5s ( 4.8x, 0.0%) me:11.5s (21.7x, -1.4%) ca:23.4s (44.1x, -2.5%) he:16.4s (30.9x, 3.3%) ca:12.6s (23.8x, 2.7%) dr:10.3s (19.4x, -0.7%) ma: 6.1s (11.6x, -0.7%)
-- heap_pdb4 --
heap_pdb4 valgrind-new:0.57s no: 2.8s ( 4.8x, -----) me:18.4s (32.3x, -----) ca:25.0s (43.9x, -----) he:19.4s (33.9x, -----) ca:15.3s (26.8x, -----) dr:11.5s (20.1x, -----) ma: 6.3s (11.0x, -----)
heap_pdb4 valgrind-old:0.57s no: 2.8s ( 4.8x, 0.0%) me:18.4s (32.4x, -0.3%) ca:24.9s (43.7x, 0.4%) he:19.2s (33.6x, 0.9%) ca:15.2s (26.6x, 0.6%) dr:11.5s (20.2x, -0.3%) ma: 6.3s (11.1x, -0.8%)
-- many-loss-records --
many-loss-records valgrind-new:0.07s no: 0.7s ( 9.3x, -----) me: 3.1s (44.7x, -----) ca: 3.5s (50.4x, -----) he: 2.5s (36.1x, -----) ca: 2.5s (35.4x, -----) dr: 2.4s (34.4x, -----) ma: 1.6s (22.9x, -----)
many-loss-records valgrind-old:0.07s no: 0.7s ( 9.4x, -1.5%) me: 3.2s (46.1x, -3.2%) ca: 3.6s (51.6x, -2.3%) he: 2.6s (37.4x, -3.6%) ca: 2.6s (37.1x, -4.8%) dr: 2.4s (33.7x, 2.1%) ma: 1.6s (23.1x, -1.2%)
-- many-xpts --
many-xpts valgrind-new:0.12s no: 0.9s ( 7.3x, -----) me: 3.7s (30.5x, -----) ca: 8.2s (68.7x, -----) he: 4.6s (38.3x, -----) ca: 3.7s (30.8x, -----) dr: 3.4s (28.5x, -----) ma: 3.6s (30.0x, -----)
many-xpts valgrind-old:0.12s no: 0.9s ( 7.4x, -1.1%) me: 3.5s (29.0x, 4.9%) ca: 8.7s (72.7x, -5.8%) he: 4.6s (38.6x, -0.7%) ca: 3.7s (30.5x, 0.8%) dr: 3.5s (29.6x, -3.8%) ma: 3.5s (29.0x, 3.3%)
-- memrw --
memrw valgrind-new:0.31s no: 1.1s ( 3.7x, -----) me: 2.3s ( 7.5x, -----) ca: 8.8s (28.5x, -----) he:13.8s (44.6x, -----) ca: 4.2s (13.5x, -----) dr: 3.1s (10.0x, -----) ma: 1.4s ( 4.6x, -----)
memrw valgrind-old:0.31s no: 1.1s ( 3.6x, 1.7%) me: 2.4s ( 7.7x, -2.1%) ca: 8.9s (28.6x, -0.3%) he:13.5s (43.7x, 2.1%) ca: 4.2s (13.5x, 0.2%) dr: 3.1s ( 9.9x, 1.3%) ma: 1.5s ( 4.8x, -2.8%)
-- sarp --
sarp valgrind-new:0.03s no: 0.6s (18.3x, -----) me: 3.8s (126.7x, -----) ca: 4.5s (150.3x, -----) he:10.8s (360.7x, -----) ca: 2.3s (77.0x, -----) dr: 1.8s (60.7x, -----) ma: 0.8s (25.7x, -----)
sarp valgrind-old:0.03s no: 0.6s (19.3x, -5.5%) me: 3.9s (130.7x, -3.2%) ca: 4.5s (150.3x, 0.0%) he:10.8s (361.7x, -0.3%) ca: 2.3s (77.7x, -0.9%) dr: 1.9s (62.3x, -2.7%) ma: 0.8s (25.3x, 1.3%)
-- tinycc --
tinycc valgrind-new:0.43s no: 5.6s (13.0x, -----) me:24.6s (57.3x, -----) ca:50.1s (116.6x, -----) he:23.4s (54.3x, -----) ca:39.2s (91.1x, -----) dr:22.3s (51.9x, -----) ma: 7.2s (16.7x, -----)
tinycc valgrind-old:0.43s no: 5.0s (11.7x, 9.8%) me:24.8s (57.6x, -0.6%) ca:50.0s (116.3x, 0.3%) he:24.8s (57.6x, -6.0%) ca:40.3s (93.7x, -2.9%) dr:22.3s (52.0x, -0.1%) ma: 6.7s (15.7x, 6.3%)
-- Finished tests in perf ----------------------------------------------
== 12 programs, 168 timings =================
5768.20user 48.97system 1:37:04elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 531900maxresident)k
0inputs+480240outputs (0major+14747927minor)pagefaults 0swaps
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/std_mutex.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- std_mutex.stderr.exp 2020-02-29 00:25:14.002637141 -0800
+++ std_mutex.stderr.out 2020-02-29 00:45:42.993782270 -0800
@@ -1,4 +1,16 @@
-Done.
+terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::system_error'
+ what(): Enable multithreading to use std::thread: Operation not permitted
+
+Process terminating with default action of signal 6 (SIGABRT)
+ at 0x........: raise (raise.c:?)
+ by 0x........: abort (abort.c:?)
+ by 0x........: __gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler() (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: std::terminate() (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: __cxa_rethrow (in /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.19)
+ by 0x........: void std::vector<std::thread, std::allocator<std::thread> >::_M_emplace_back_aux<main::{lambda()#1}>(main::{lambda()#1}&&) (vector.tcc:426)
+ by 0x........: void std::vector<std::thread, std::allocator<std::thread> >::emplace_back<main::{lambda()#1}>(main::{lambda()#1}&&) (vector.tcc:101)
+ by 0x........: main (std_mutex.cpp:?)
ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-ppc
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-ppc 2020-02-29 00:25:13.992638111 -0800
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2020-02-29 00:46:02.421905551 -0800
@@ -7,28 +7,20 @@
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:20)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+ at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:47)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+ at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-s390
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-s390 2020-02-29 00:25:13.992638111 -0800
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2020-02-29 00:46:02.421905551 -0800
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
- by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-x86
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-x86 2020-02-29 00:25:13.992638111 -0800
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2020-02-29 00:46:02.421905551 -0800
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
@@ -16,19 +16,11 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc2.8
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc2.8 2020-02-29 00:25:13.992638111 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2020-02-29 00:46:07.241439986 -0800
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: (below main)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-ppc
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-ppc 2020-02-29 00:25:13.992638111 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2020-02-29 00:46:07.241439986 -0800
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-s390
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-s390 2020-02-29 00:25:14.002637141 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2020-02-29 00:46:07.241439986 -0800
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: ???
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-solaris
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-solaris 2020-02-29 00:25:13.992638111 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2020-02-29 00:46:07.241439986 -0800
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Thread 2:
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
@@ -15,6 +16,7 @@
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Thread 1:
The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
@@ -24,10 +26,11 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
---------------------
Mutex not locked by calling thread: mutex 0x........, recursion count 0, owner 1.
@@ -37,18 +40,12 @@
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
+ by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
The object at address 0x........ is not a mutex.
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-x86
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-x86 2020-02-29 00:25:14.002637141 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2020-02-29 00:46:07.241439986 -0800
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: (below main)
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/hginfo.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- hginfo.stderrB.exp 2020-02-29 00:25:13.882648786 -0800
+++ hginfo.stderrB.out 2020-02-29 00:31:01.548906326 -0800
@@ -11,6 +11,10 @@
...
Block was alloc'd by thread #x
Lock ga 0x........ {
+ Address 0x........ is 2440 bytes inside data symbol "_rtld_local"
+ kind mbRec
+}
+Lock ga 0x........ {
Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "mx"
kind mbRec
{ W1:thread #x tid #x }
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/hgtls.stdoutB.diff
=================================================
--- hgtls.stdoutB.exp 2020-02-29 00:25:13.892647816 -0800
+++ hgtls.stdoutB.out 2020-02-29 00:31:04.928578311 -0800
@@ -8,38 +8,8 @@
test race tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
55 int here = 0;
-test local tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test local tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test global tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test global tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test static_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test static_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_local tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_local tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_global tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
-55 int here = 0;
-test so_global tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
-Program exited normally.
+A debugging session is active.
+ Inferior 1 [Remote target] will be detached.
+Quit anyway? (y or n) [answered Y; input not from terminal]
+Detaching from program: /home/mark/valgrind-nightly/nightly/valgrind-new/none/tests/tls, Remote target
+Ending remote debugging.
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/mcinfcallWSRU.stderrB.diff
=================================================
--- mcinfcallWSRU.stderrB.exp 2020-02-29 00:25:13.882648786 -0800
+++ mcinfcallWSRU.stderrB.out 2020-02-29 00:31:16.097494308 -0800
@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@
$1 = void
[Switching to thread 2 (Thread ....)]
#0 0x........ in syscall ...
+ timeout=0x........ <t+16>)
+54 ../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/generic/select.c: No such file or directory.
Could not write register "xxx"; remote failure reply 'E.
ERROR changing register xxx regno y
gdb commands changing registers (pc, sp, ...) (e.g. 'jump',
@@ -31,6 +33,8 @@
'
[Switching to thread 3 (Thread ....)]
#0 0x........ in syscall ...
+ timeout=0x........ <t+32>)
+54 in ../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/generic/select.c
Could not write register "xxx"; remote failure reply 'E.
ERROR changing register xxx regno y
gdb commands changing registers (pc, sp, ...) (e.g. 'jump',
@@ -40,6 +44,8 @@
'
[Switching to thread 4 (Thread ....)]
#0 0x........ in syscall ...
+ timeout=0x........ <t+48>)
+54 in ../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/generic/select.c
Could not write register "xxx"; remote failure reply 'E.
ERROR changing register xxx regno y
gdb commands changing registers (pc, sp, ...) (e.g. 'jump',
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/nlvgdbsigqueue.stdoutB.diff
=================================================
--- nlvgdbsigqueue.stdoutB.exp 2020-02-29 00:25:13.882648786 -0800
+++ nlvgdbsigqueue.stdoutB.out 2020-02-29 00:31:53.923825278 -0800
@@ -9,8 +9,10 @@
Continuing.
Program received signal SIGUSR1, User defined signal 1.
0x........ in syscall ...
+54 in ../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/generic/select.c
continuing to receive second SIGUSR1
Continuing.
Program received signal SIGUSR1, User defined signal 1.
0x........ in syscall ...
+54 in ../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/generic/select.c
Kill the program being debugged? (y or n) [answered Y; input not from terminal]
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/nlvgdbsigqueue.stdoutB.diff-solaris1
=================================================
--- nlvgdbsigqueue.stdoutB.exp-solaris1 2020-02-29 00:25:13.882648786 -0800
+++ nlvgdbsigqueue.stdoutB.out 2020-02-29 00:31:53.923825278 -0800
@@ -9,8 +9,10 @@
Continuing.
Program received signal SIGUSR1, User defined signal 1.
0x........ in syscall ...
+54 in ../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/generic/select.c
continuing to receive second SIGUSR1
Continuing.
-Program received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap.
+Program received signal SIGUSR1, User defined signal 1.
0x........ in syscall ...
+54 in ../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/generic/select.c
Kill the program being debugged? (y or n) [answered Y; input not from terminal]
=================================================
./valgrind-new/gdbserver_tests/nlvgdbsigqueue.stdoutB.diff-solaris2
=================================================
--- nlvgdbsigqueue.stdoutB.exp-solaris2 2020-02-29 00:25:13.882648786 -0800
+++ nlvgdbsigqueue.stdoutB.out 2020-02-29 00:31:53.923825278 -0800
@@ -7,11 +7,12 @@
sending signal
continuing to receive first SIGUSR1
Continuing.
-[New Thread ....]
Program received signal SIGUSR1, User defined signal 1.
0x........ in syscall ...
+54 in ../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/generic/select.c
continuing to receive second SIGUSR1
Continuing.
-Program received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap.
+Program received signal SIGUSR1, User defined signal 1.
0x........ in syscall ...
+54 in ../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/generic/select.c
Kill the program being debugged? (y or n) [answered Y; input not from terminal]
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/hg05_race2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- hg05_race2.stderr.exp 2020-02-29 00:25:14.152622584 -0800
+++ hg05_race2.stderr.out 2020-02-29 00:37:41.660263670 -0800
@@ -26,8 +26,7 @@
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside foo.poot[5].plop[11],
- declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -42,8 +41,7 @@
at 0x........: th (hg05_race2.c:17)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside foo.poot[5].plop[11],
- declared at hg05_race2.c:24, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp 2020-02-29 00:25:14.152622584 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2020-02-29 00:38:36.145003641 -0800
@@ -39,7 +39,6 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
- in frame #x, created by nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:16)
----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -117,7 +116,6 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
- in frame #x, created by nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:16)
----------------------------------------------------------------
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-solaris
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-solaris 2020-02-29 00:25:14.132624525 -0800
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2020-02-29 00:38:36.145003641 -0800
@@ -39,7 +39,6 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
- in frame #x, created by nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:16)
----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -53,7 +52,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: mutex_unlock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
@@ -117,7 +116,6 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
- in frame #x, created by nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:16)
----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -131,7 +129,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: mutex_unlock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp 2020-02-29 00:25:14.132624525 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2020-02-29 00:39:02.382470504 -0800
@@ -169,8 +169,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:57, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(1) no error on next line
@@ -187,8 +187,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(4) no error on next line
@@ -207,8 +207,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-glibc-2.18
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-glibc-2.18 2020-02-29 00:25:14.132624525 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2020-02-29 00:39:02.382470504 -0800
@@ -57,6 +57,14 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_destroy failed
+ with error code 16 (EBUSY: Device or resource busy)
+ at 0x........: mutex_destroy_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:117)
+
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_lock failed
with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: mutex_lock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
@@ -157,10 +165,13 @@
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:194)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
+
(1) no error on next line
(2) no error on next line
@@ -172,10 +183,13 @@
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:211)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
+
(4) no error on next line
(5) no error on next line
@@ -187,11 +201,14 @@
Thread #x unlocked a not-locked lock at 0x........
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:232)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
@@ -224,6 +241,7 @@
with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:284)
@@ -238,4 +256,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 22 errors from 22 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-glibc-2.21
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-glibc-2.21 2020-02-29 00:25:14.152622584 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2020-02-29 00:39:02.382470504 -0800
@@ -169,8 +169,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:57, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(1) no error on next line
@@ -187,8 +187,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(4) no error on next line
@@ -207,8 +207,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
@@ -235,6 +235,15 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:281)
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:284)
+
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
@@ -247,4 +256,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 22 errors from 22 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-mips32
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-mips32 2020-02-29 00:25:14.142623555 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2020-02-29 00:39:02.382470504 -0800
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_join failed
- with error code 45 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
+ with error code 35 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
at 0x........: pthread_join_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_join (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:93)
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_init failed
- with error code 122 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
+ with error code 95 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:107)
@@ -169,8 +169,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:57, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(1) no error on next line
@@ -187,8 +187,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(4) no error on next line
@@ -207,8 +207,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
@@ -235,6 +235,15 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:281)
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:284)
+
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
@@ -247,4 +256,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 22 errors from 22 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-mips32-b
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-mips32-b 2020-02-29 00:25:14.142623555 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2020-02-29 00:39:02.382470504 -0800
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_join failed
- with error code 45 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
+ with error code 35 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
at 0x........: pthread_join_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_join (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:93)
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_init failed
- with error code 122 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
+ with error code 95 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:107)
@@ -169,8 +169,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:57, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(1) no error on next line
@@ -187,8 +187,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
(4) no error on next line
@@ -207,8 +207,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "rwl2"
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:58, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
- with error code 89 (ENOSYS: Function not implemented)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-s390x
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-s390x 2020-02-29 00:25:14.142623555 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2020-02-29 00:39:02.382470504 -0800
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
Thread #x was created
...
- by 0x........: pthread_create_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:86)
@@ -28,9 +27,8 @@
at 0x........: racy_child (tc20_verifywrap.c:44)
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
-
-Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprotected"
-declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:37
+ Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "unprotected"
+ declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:37
----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -167,10 +165,13 @@
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:194)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
+
(1) no error on next line
(2) no error on next line
@@ -182,10 +183,13 @@
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:211)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
+
(4) no error on next line
(5) no error on next line
@@ -199,10 +203,12 @@
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:232)
- Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:201)
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
@@ -229,6 +235,15 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:281)
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+ at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+ by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:284)
+
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
@@ -241,4 +256,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 22 errors from 22 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff-solaris
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp-solaris 2020-02-29 00:25:14.142623555 -0800
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2020-02-29 00:39:02.382470504 -0800
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_join failed
- with error code 45 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
+ with error code 35 (EDEADLK: Resource deadlock would occur)
at 0x........: pthread_join_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_join (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:93)
@@ -43,8 +43,8 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to mutex_init failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_init failed
+ with error code 95 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:107)
@@ -57,8 +57,16 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
+Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_destroy failed
+ with error code 16 (EBUSY: Device or resource busy)
+ at 0x........: mutex_destroy_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:117)
+
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_lock failed
- with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: mutex_lock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:123)
@@ -66,7 +74,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_trylock failed
- with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: mutex_trylock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_mutex_trylock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:131)
@@ -74,7 +82,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_timedlock failed
- with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: mutex_timedlock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_mutex_timedlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:136)
@@ -89,7 +97,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: mutex_unlock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:140)
@@ -142,7 +150,7 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x's call to pthread_cond_timedwait failed
- with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
+ with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
at 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_cond_timedwait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:180)
@@ -158,22 +166,13 @@
...
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:194)
Lock at 0x........ was first observed
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- ...
+ at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:193)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside rwl.__pthread_rwlock_readers,
- declared at tc20_verifywrap.c:57, in frame #x of thread x
+ Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
+ in frame #x, created by main (tc20_verifywrap.c:49)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_rwlock_unlock failed
- with error code 1 (EPERM: Operation not permitted)
- at 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: pthread_rwlock_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- ...
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:194)
-
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/dw4.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- dw4.stderr.exp 2020-02-29 00:25:13.932643934 -0800
+++ dw4.stderr.out 2020-02-29 00:32:39.529424623 -0800
@@ -14,8 +14,8 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (dw4.c:32)
by 0x........: main (dw4.c:62)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local.i,
- declared at dw4.c:51, in frame #1 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #1, created by main (dw4.c:50)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (dw4.c:32)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/dw4.stderr.diff-solaris
=================================================
--- dw4.stderr.exp-solaris 2020-02-29 00:25:13.962641023 -0800
+++ dw4.stderr.out 2020-02-29 00:32:39.529424623 -0800
@@ -14,8 +14,8 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (dw4.c:32)
by 0x........: main (dw4.c:62)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local.i,
- declared at dw4.c:51, in frame #1 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #1, created by main (dw4.c:50)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (dw4.c:32)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/sigaltstack.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- sigaltstack.stderr.exp 2020-02-29 00:25:13.972640052 -0800
+++ sigaltstack.stderr.out 2020-02-29 00:34:59.575909204 -0800
@@ -4,3 +4,51 @@
raising the signal
caught signal, local var is on 0x........
done
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid write of size 4
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid write of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid read of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+Invalid write of size 8
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/supp_unknown.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- supp_unknown.stderr.exp 2020-02-29 00:25:13.922644904 -0800
+++ supp_unknown.stderr.out 2020-02-29 00:35:13.284586081 -0800
@@ -1,8 +1,11 @@
+Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
+
Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Access not within mapped region at address 0x........
...
- by 0x........: main (badjump.c:17)
If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
possible), you can try to increase the size of the
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/supp_unknown.stderr.diff-kfail
=================================================
--- supp_unknown.stderr.exp-kfail 2020-02-29 00:25:13.922644904 -0800
+++ supp_unknown.stderr.out 2020-02-29 00:35:13.284586081 -0800
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
+
Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Access not within mapped region at address 0x........
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo1.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- varinfo1.stderr.exp 2020-02-29 00:25:13.912645875 -0800
+++ varinfo1.stderr.out 2020-02-29 00:35:55.750487231 -0800
@@ -32,6 +32,6 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (varinfo1.c:28)
by 0x........: main (varinfo1.c:56)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "local"
- declared at varinfo1.c:46, in frame #1 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #1, created by main (varinfo1.c:45)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo1.stderr.diff-ppc64
=================================================
--- varinfo1.stderr.exp-ppc64 2020-02-29 00:25:13.922644904 -0800
+++ varinfo1.stderr.out 2020-02-29 00:35:55.750487231 -0800
@@ -1,37 +1,37 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo1.c:29)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo1.c:28)
by 0x........: main (varinfo1.c:49)
Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 3 alloc'd
at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (varinfo1.c:47)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo1.c:29)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo1.c:28)
by 0x........: main (varinfo1.c:52)
Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "global_u1"
declared at varinfo1.c:35
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo1.c:29)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo1.c:28)
by 0x........: main (varinfo1.c:53)
Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global var "global_i1"
declared at varinfo1.c:37
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo1.c:29)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo1.c:28)
by 0x........: main (varinfo1.c:54)
Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global_u2[3],
a global variable declared at varinfo1.c:39
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo1.c:29)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo1.c:28)
by 0x........: main (varinfo1.c:55)
Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside global_i2[7],
a global variable declared at varinfo1.c:41
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo1.c:29)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo1.c:28)
by 0x........: main (varinfo1.c:56)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside local var "local"
- declared at varinfo1.c:46, in frame #1 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #1, created by main (varinfo1.c:45)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo2.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- varinfo2.stderr.exp 2020-02-29 00:25:13.932643934 -0800
+++ varinfo2.stderr.out 2020-02-29 00:36:00.250052914 -0800
@@ -2,20 +2,20 @@
at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:28)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo2.c:41)
by 0x........: main (varinfo2.c:51)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside var[7],
- declared at varinfo2.c:39, in frame #1 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #1, created by foo (varinfo2.c:36)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:28)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo2.c:43)
by 0x........: main (varinfo2.c:51)
- Location 0x........ is 2 bytes inside var.bar,
- declared at varinfo2.c:42, in frame #1 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #1, created by foo (varinfo2.c:36)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:28)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo2.c:46)
by 0x........: main (varinfo2.c:51)
- Location 0x........ is 1 byte inside local var "var"
- declared at varinfo2.c:37, in frame #1 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #1, created by foo (varinfo2.c:36)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo2.stderr.diff-ppc64
=================================================
--- varinfo2.stderr.exp-ppc64 2020-02-29 00:25:13.962641023 -0800
+++ varinfo2.stderr.out 2020-02-29 00:36:00.250052914 -0800
@@ -1,21 +1,21 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:29)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo2.c:28)
by 0x........: foo (varinfo2.c:41)
by 0x........: main (varinfo2.c:51)
- Location 0x........ is 0 bytes inside var[7],
- declared at varinfo2.c:39, in frame #1 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
+ in frame #1, created by foo (varinfo2.c:36)
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........:...
[truncated message content] |
