Re: [Valgrind-developers] compatibility with LLD

[Andrew K. <sup...@gm...>]

On Fri, Apr 6, 2018, 1:01 PM Tom Hughes <to...@co...> wrote:

> On 06/04/18 17:07, John Reiser wrote:
> >> I had a look at readelf output and the layout of the lld-linked object
> >> file looks sane to me.
> >
> > Well then, _you_ can fix it.
> >
> > If you want help, then please show the output from
> >      readelf --headers ./test
> > both with and without -fuse-ld=lld .
> > [Especially because lld is not readily available: not packaged in
> > Fedora, for instance.]
>
> I debugged it with him on IRC last night - the issue is that it
> has a third segment that is RO and which contains the eh_frame
> section.
>
> I knocked up a patch last night that seemed to fix it for me
> though apparently not for Andrew.
>

The patch fixes this use case:
gcc -c test.c -g; ld.lld -o test test.o

However not this use case:
clang -c test.c -g; ld.lld -o test test.o



> Tom
>
> --
> Tom Hughes (to...@co...)
> http://compton.nu/
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Valgrind-developers mailing list
> Val...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-developers
>