Re: [Valgrind-users] Spam (9.229): Problem with suppressions

[Dominik S. <dom...@on...>]

Hi Julian,
similar to my answer to John:
why isn't suppression working here ?

Regards

Dominik

Am 30.08.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Julian Seward:
>> As these seem OK to me (cryprography intentionally works with
>> uninitialized values) I would like to suppress them.
> Another thing you could consider doing, if you really have to use undefined
> values, is to figure out where they come from (heap or stack allocation,
> use --track-origins) and then add a VALGRIND_MAKE_DEFINED (or whatever it is
> called) client request.  This lies to Memcheck, claiming the inputs are
> defined when they are not really.  But at least it will not complain about
> undefinedness from them alone, after that.
>
> See <valgrind/memcheck.h>.
>
> J