|
From: John R. <jr...@bi...> - 2016-12-29 16:46:15
|
On 12/29/2016 07:09 AM, Eliot Moss wrote: > On 12/29/2016 8:50 AM, Ivo Raisr wrote: >> Dear developers, >> Please kindly review proposed patch for bug 162848 [1] >> and let me know your comments. >> Kind regards, >> I. >> >> [1] https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162848 > > I had developed a patch some time ago that allows for a script to > be invoked to generate the log file name to be used for each fork. > Among other things, this allows for a fresh named pipe to be created > with a process at the other end to consume the output (for me, > typically gzip, to compress large traces). > > AFAIK it is still pending because I did not provide a regression > test case (sigh). Maybe this should be revived and I should create > a test case. Let me know if you would like the patch posted here. Post it as an attachment to some bug report: your own, or Ivo's bug report above. |