|
From: <ma...@bu...> - 2016-10-24 04:38:25
|
valgrind revision: 16103
VEX revision:
C compiler: gcc (GCC) 5.3.1 20160406 (Red Hat 5.3.1-6)
GDB: GNU gdb (GDB) Fedora 7.10.1-31.fc23
Assembler: GNU assembler version 2.25-17.fc23
C library: GNU C Library (GNU libc) stable release version 2.22
uname -mrs: Linux 4.4.3-300.fc23.s390x s390x
Vendor version: Fedora 23 (Twenty Three)
Nightly build on lfedora1 ( Fedora release 23 (Twenty Three), s390x )
Started at 2016-10-24 00:00:01 UTC
Ended at 2016-10-24 04:22:35 UTC
Results differ from 24 hours ago
Checking out valgrind source tree ... failed
Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo
A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/fxsave.stdout.exp
A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/espindola2.vgtest
A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/sse1_memory.vgtest
A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/filter_pushfpopf
A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/insn_sse2.stdout.exp
A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/espindola2.c
A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/insn_basic.stdout.exp
A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/fpeflags.stderr.exp
A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/insn_mmxext.stdout.exp
A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/pushfpopf.stdout.exp
A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/xor-undef-x86.stderr.exp
A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/insn_cmov.stderr.exp
A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/fxsave.stderr.exp
A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/sh-mem-vec128-plo-yes.stdout.exp
A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/insn_sse2.stderr.exp
A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/fpeflags.vgtest
A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/bug152022.stdout.exp
A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/insn_basic.stderr.exp
A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/xor-undef-x86.vgtest
svn: E000104: Can't read from connection: Connection reset by peer
=================================================
== Results from 24 hours ago ==
=================================================
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 710 tests, 5 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 1 stdoutB failure, 2 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/hgtls (stdoutB)
memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior (stderr)
memcheck/tests/memcmptest (stderr)
massif/tests/new-cpp (post)
massif/tests/overloaded-new (post)
helgrind/tests/bar_bad (stderr)
helgrind/tests/pth_destroy_cond (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc22_exit_w_lock (stderr)
=================================================
== Difference between 24 hours ago and now ==
=================================================
*** old.short 2016-10-24 01:32:11.905023532 +0000
--- new.short 2016-10-24 04:22:35.195023532 +0000
***************
*** 1,18 ****
! Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
! Configuring valgrind ... done
! Building valgrind ... done
! Running regression tests ... failed
!
! Regression test results follow
!
! == 710 tests, 5 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 1 stdoutB failure, 2 post failures ==
! gdbserver_tests/hgtls (stdoutB)
! memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior (stderr)
! memcheck/tests/memcmptest (stderr)
! massif/tests/new-cpp (post)
! massif/tests/overloaded-new (post)
! helgrind/tests/bar_bad (stderr)
! helgrind/tests/pth_destroy_cond (stderr)
! helgrind/tests/tc22_exit_w_lock (stderr)
--- 1,24 ----
! Checking out valgrind source tree ... failed
+ Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo
+ A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/fxsave.stdout.exp
+ A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/espindola2.vgtest
+ A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/sse1_memory.vgtest
+ A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/filter_pushfpopf
+ A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/insn_sse2.stdout.exp
+ A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/espindola2.c
+ A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/insn_basic.stdout.exp
+ A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/fpeflags.stderr.exp
+ A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/insn_mmxext.stdout.exp
+ A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/pushfpopf.stdout.exp
+ A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/xor-undef-x86.stderr.exp
+ A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/insn_cmov.stderr.exp
+ A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/fxsave.stderr.exp
+ A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/sh-mem-vec128-plo-yes.stdout.exp
+ A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/insn_sse2.stderr.exp
+ A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/fpeflags.vgtest
+ A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/bug152022.stdout.exp
+ A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/insn_basic.stderr.exp
+ A valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/x86/xor-undef-x86.vgtest
+ svn: E000104: Can't read from connection: Connection reset by peer
=================================================
./valgrind-old/gdbserver_tests/hgtls.stdoutB.diff
=================================================
--- hgtls.stdoutB.exp 2016-10-24 00:00:51.145023532 +0000
+++ hgtls.stdoutB.out 2016-10-24 01:13:47.505023532 +0000
@@ -8,28 +8,28 @@
test race tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
55 int here = 0;
-test local tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
+test local tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 0
Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
55 int here = 0;
-test local tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
+test local tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 0
Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
55 int here = 0;
-test global tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
+test global tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 0
Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
55 int here = 0;
-test global tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
+test global tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 0
Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
55 int here = 0;
-test static_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
+test static_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 0
Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
55 int here = 0;
-test static_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
+test static_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 0
Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
55 int here = 0;
-test so_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
+test so_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 0
Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
55 int here = 0;
-test so_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
+test so_extern tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 0
Breakpoint 1, tls_ptr (p=0x........) at tls.c:55
55 int here = 0;
test so_local tls_ip 0x........ ip 0x........ equal 1
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/bar_bad.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- bar_bad.stderr.exp 2016-10-24 00:18:09.835023532 +0000
+++ bar_bad.stderr.out 2016-10-24 01:24:18.085023532 +0000
@@ -62,3 +62,18 @@
at 0x........: pthread_barrier_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:96)
+---Thread-Announcement------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x was created
+ ...
+ by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:76)
+
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x: pthread_barrier_wait: barrier is uninitialised
+ at 0x........: pthread_barrier_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: sleep1 (bar_bad.c:22)
+ by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/bar_bad.stderr.diff-destroy-hang
=================================================
--- bar_bad.stderr.exp-destroy-hang 2016-10-24 00:18:09.815023532 +0000
+++ bar_bad.stderr.out 2016-10-24 01:24:18.085023532 +0000
@@ -47,6 +47,21 @@
at 0x........: pthread_barrier_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:82)
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x's call to pthread_barrier_destroy failed
+ with error code 16 (EBUSY: Device or resource busy)
+ at 0x........: pthread_barrier_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:82)
+
+
+destroy a barrier that was never initialised
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x: pthread_barrier_destroy: barrier was never initialised
+ at 0x........: pthread_barrier_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:96)
+
---Thread-Announcement------------------------------------------
Thread #x was created
@@ -62,11 +77,3 @@
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
-
-destroy a barrier that was never initialised
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x: pthread_barrier_destroy: barrier was never initialised
- at 0x........: pthread_barrier_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:96)
-
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/pth_destroy_cond.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- pth_destroy_cond.stderr.exp 2016-10-24 00:18:09.825023532 +0000
+++ pth_destroy_cond.stderr.out 2016-10-24 01:24:51.555023532 +0000
@@ -5,6 +5,34 @@
by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (pth_destroy_cond.c:29)
+---Thread-Announcement------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x is the program's root thread
+
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+ Lock at 0x........ was first observed
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_destroy_cond.c:25)
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "mutex"
+
+Possible data race during read of size 1 at 0x........ by thread #x
+Locks held: 1, at address 0x........
+ at 0x........: my_memcmp (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_destroy_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_destroy@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: ThreadFunction (pth_destroy_cond.c:18)
+ by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+
+This conflicts with a previous write of size 4 by thread #x
+Locks held: none
+ ...
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_cond_wait@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (pth_destroy_cond.c:31)
+ Address 0x........ is 4 bytes inside data symbol "cond"
+
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x: pthread_cond_destroy: destruction of condition variable being waited upon
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc22_exit_w_lock.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc22_exit_w_lock.stderr.exp 2016-10-24 00:18:09.825023532 +0000
+++ tc22_exit_w_lock.stderr.out 2016-10-24 01:26:01.975023532 +0000
@@ -13,6 +13,23 @@
---Thread-Announcement------------------------------------------
+Thread #x is the program's root thread
+
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Possible data race during write of size 8 at 0x........ by thread #x
+Locks held: none
+ ...
+ by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc22_exit_w_lock.c:42)
+
+This conflicts with a previous read of size 8 by thread #x
+Locks held: none
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+---Thread-Announcement------------------------------------------
+
Thread #x was created
...
by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
@@ -27,10 +44,6 @@
Process terminating with default action of signal 6 (SIGABRT)
...
by 0x........: main (tc22_exit_w_lock.c:48)
----Thread-Announcement------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x is the program's root thread
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
@@ -38,4 +51,4 @@
by 0x........: main (tc22_exit_w_lock.c:48)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 5 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc22_exit_w_lock.stderr.diff-kfail-x86
=================================================
--- tc22_exit_w_lock.stderr.exp-kfail-x86 2016-10-24 00:18:09.835023532 +0000
+++ tc22_exit_w_lock.stderr.out 2016-10-24 01:26:01.975023532 +0000
@@ -3,7 +3,6 @@
Thread #x was created
...
- by 0x........: pthread_create_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc22_exit_w_lock.c:39)
@@ -14,9 +13,25 @@
---Thread-Announcement------------------------------------------
+Thread #x is the program's root thread
+
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Possible data race during write of size 8 at 0x........ by thread #x
+Locks held: none
+ ...
+ by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc22_exit_w_lock.c:42)
+
+This conflicts with a previous read of size 8 by thread #x
+Locks held: none
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+---Thread-Announcement------------------------------------------
+
Thread #x was created
...
- by 0x........: pthread_create_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc22_exit_w_lock.c:42)
@@ -25,14 +40,15 @@
Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
...
----Thread-Announcement------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x is the program's root thread
+Process terminating with default action of signal 6 (SIGABRT)
+ ...
+ by 0x........: main (tc22_exit_w_lock.c:48)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
...
+ by 0x........: main (tc22_exit_w_lock.c:48)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 5 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc22_exit_w_lock.stderr.diff-solaris
=================================================
--- tc22_exit_w_lock.stderr.exp-solaris 2016-10-24 00:18:09.835023532 +0000
+++ tc22_exit_w_lock.stderr.out 2016-10-24 01:26:01.975023532 +0000
@@ -13,6 +13,23 @@
---Thread-Announcement------------------------------------------
+Thread #x is the program's root thread
+
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Possible data race during write of size 8 at 0x........ by thread #x
+Locks held: none
+ ...
+ by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc22_exit_w_lock.c:42)
+
+This conflicts with a previous read of size 8 by thread #x
+Locks held: none
+ ...
+ Address 0x........ is in a rw- anonymous segment
+
+---Thread-Announcement------------------------------------------
+
Thread #x was created
...
by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
@@ -26,14 +43,12 @@
Process terminating with default action of signal 6 (SIGABRT)
...
----Thread-Announcement------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x is the program's root thread
-
+ by 0x........: main (tc22_exit_w_lock.c:48)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
...
+ by 0x........: main (tc22_exit_w_lock.c:48)
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 5 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/massif/tests/new-cpp.post.diff
=================================================
--- new-cpp.post.exp 2016-10-24 00:06:53.315023532 +0000
+++ new-cpp.post.out 2016-10-24 01:20:57.275023532 +0000
@@ -6,54 +6,60 @@
KB
-11.75^ ###########
- | #
- | #
- | #
- | :::::::#
- | : #
- | : #
- | ::::::: # ::::::::::::
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | ::::::::::::: : # : ::::::
- | : : : # : :
- | : : : # : :
- | : : : # : : ::::::
- | : : : # : : :
- | : : : # : : :
+82.76^ ###
+ | :::# :::
+ | ::::: # : :
+ | :::: :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
0 +----------------------------------------------------------------------->KB
- 0 23.50
+ 0 94.51
-Number of snapshots: 10
- Detailed snapshots: [5 (peak)]
+Number of snapshots: 11
+ Detailed snapshots: [6 (peak)]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 0 0 0 0 0
- 1 4,008 4,008 4,000 8 0
- 2 8,016 8,016 8,000 16 0
- 3 10,024 10,024 10,000 24 0
- 4 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
- 5 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
-99.73% (12,000B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:19)
+ 1 72,712 72,712 72,704 8 0
+ 2 76,720 76,720 76,704 16 0
+ 3 80,728 80,728 80,704 24 0
+ 4 82,736 82,736 82,704 32 0
+ 5 84,744 84,744 84,704 40 0
+ 6 84,744 84,744 84,704 40 0
+99.95% (84,704B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
+->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.21)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: call_init.part.0 (in /usr/lib64/ld-2.22.so)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: _dl_init (in /usr/lib64/ld-2.22.so)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib64/ld-2.22.so)
+|
+->04.72% (4,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:19)
|
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:20)
+->04.72% (4,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:20)
|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:21)
+->02.36% (2,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:21)
|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:22)
+->02.36% (2,000B) 0x........: main (new-cpp.cpp:22)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- 6 16,040 8,024 8,000 24 0
- 7 20,048 4,016 4,000 16 0
- 8 22,056 2,008 2,000 8 0
- 9 24,064 0 0 0 0
+ 7 88,752 80,736 80,704 32 0
+ 8 92,760 76,728 76,704 24 0
+ 9 94,768 74,720 74,704 16 0
+ 10 96,776 72,712 72,704 8 0
=================================================
./valgrind-old/massif/tests/overloaded-new.post.diff
=================================================
--- overloaded-new.post.exp 2016-10-24 00:06:53.305023532 +0000
+++ overloaded-new.post.out 2016-10-24 01:20:59.135023532 +0000
@@ -6,54 +6,60 @@
KB
-11.75^ ###########
- | #
- | #
- | #
- | :::::::#
- | : #
- | : #
- | ::::::: # ::::::::::::
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | ::::::::::::: : # : ::::::
- | : : : # : :
- | : : : # : :
- | : : : # : : ::::::
- | : : : # : : :
- | : : : # : : :
+82.76^ ###
+ | :::# :::
+ | ::::: # : :
+ | :::: :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
0 +----------------------------------------------------------------------->KB
- 0 23.50
+ 0 94.51
-Number of snapshots: 10
- Detailed snapshots: [5 (peak)]
+Number of snapshots: 11
+ Detailed snapshots: [6 (peak)]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 0 0 0 0 0
- 1 4,008 4,008 4,000 8 0
- 2 8,016 8,016 8,000 16 0
- 3 10,024 10,024 10,000 24 0
- 4 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
- 5 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
-99.73% (12,000B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
+ 1 72,712 72,712 72,704 8 0
+ 2 76,720 76,720 76,704 16 0
+ 3 80,728 80,728 80,704 24 0
+ 4 82,736 82,736 82,704 32 0
+ 5 84,744 84,744 84,704 40 0
+ 6 84,744 84,744 84,704 40 0
+99.95% (84,704B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
+->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.21)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: call_init.part.0 (in /usr/lib64/ld-2.22.so)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: _dl_init (in /usr/lib64/ld-2.22.so)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib64/ld-2.22.so)
+|
+->04.72% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
|
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
+->04.72% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
+->02.36% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:52)
+->02.36% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:52)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- 6 16,040 8,024 8,000 24 0
- 7 20,048 4,016 4,000 16 0
- 8 22,056 2,008 2,000 8 0
- 9 24,064 0 0 0 0
+ 7 88,752 80,736 80,704 32 0
+ 8 92,760 76,728 76,704 24 0
+ 9 94,768 74,720 74,704 16 0
+ 10 96,776 72,712 72,704 8 0
=================================================
./valgrind-old/massif/tests/overloaded-new.post.diff-mips32
=================================================
--- overloaded-new.post.exp-mips32 2016-10-24 00:06:53.325023532 +0000
+++ overloaded-new.post.out 2016-10-24 01:20:59.135023532 +0000
@@ -1,63 +1,65 @@
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Command: ./overloaded-new
-Massif arguments: --stacks=no --time-unit=B --massif-out-file=massif.out --ignore-fn=__part_load_locale --ignore-fn=__time_load_locale --ignore-fn=dwarf2_unwind_dyld_add_image_hook --ignore-fn=get_or_create_key_element
+Massif arguments: --stacks=no --time-unit=B --massif-out-file=massif.out --ignore-fn=__part_load_locale --ignore-fn=__time_load_locale --ignore-fn=dwarf2_unwind_dyld_add_image_hook --ignore-fn=get_or_create_key_element --ignore-fn=_GLOBAL__sub_I_eh_alloc.cc
ms_print arguments: massif.out
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
KB
-11.75^ ###########
- | #
- | #
- | #
- | :::::::#
- | : #
- | : #
- | ::::::: # ::::::::::::
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | : : # :
- | ::::::::::::: : # : ::::::
- | : : : # : :
- | : : : # : :
- | : : : # : : ::::::
- | : : : # : : :
- | : : : # : : :
+82.76^ ###
+ | :::# :::
+ | ::::: # : :
+ | :::: :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
+ | : : :: # : :::
0 +----------------------------------------------------------------------->KB
- 0 23.50
+ 0 94.51
-Number of snapshots: 10
- Detailed snapshots: [5 (peak)]
+Number of snapshots: 11
+ Detailed snapshots: [6 (peak)]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
n time(B) total(B) useful-heap(B) extra-heap(B) stacks(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 0 0 0 0 0
- 1 4,008 4,008 4,000 8 0
- 2 8,016 8,016 8,000 16 0
- 3 10,024 10,024 10,000 24 0
- 4 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
- 5 12,032 12,032 12,000 32 0
-99.73% (12,000B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: operator new(unsigned int) (overloaded-new.cpp:19)
-| ->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
-|
-->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: operator new(unsigned int, std::nothrow_t const&) (overloaded-new.cpp:24)
-| ->33.24% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
-|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: operator new[](unsigned int) (overloaded-new.cpp:29)
-| ->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
-|
-->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: operator new[](unsigned int, std::nothrow_t const&) (overloaded-new.cpp:34)
- ->16.62% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:52)
-
+ 1 72,712 72,712 72,704 8 0
+ 2 76,720 76,720 76,704 16 0
+ 3 80,728 80,728 80,704 24 0
+ 4 82,736 82,736 82,704 32 0
+ 5 84,744 84,744 84,704 40 0
+ 6 84,744 84,744 84,704 40 0
+99.95% (84,704B) (heap allocation functions) malloc/new/new[], --alloc-fns, etc.
+->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.21)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: call_init.part.0 (in /usr/lib64/ld-2.22.so)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: _dl_init (in /usr/lib64/ld-2.22.so)
+| ->85.79% (72,704B) 0x........: ??? (in /usr/lib64/ld-2.22.so)
+|
+->04.72% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:49)
+|
+->04.72% (4,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:50)
+|
+->02.36% (2,000B) 0x........: main (overloaded-new.cpp:51)
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp 2016-10-24 00:03:10.285023532 +0000
+++ leak_cpp_interior.stderr.out 2016-10-24 01:16:44.655023532 +0000
@@ -1,118 +1,112 @@
valgrind output will go to log
VALGRIND_DO_LEAK_CHECK
-4 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
+8 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
by 0x........: doit() (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:115)
by 0x........: main (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:130)
LEAK SUMMARY:
- definitely lost: 4 bytes in 1 blocks
+ definitely lost: 8 bytes in 1 blocks
indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
- still reachable: 163 bytes in 8 blocks
+ still reachable: 72,894 bytes in 8 blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 56 bytes in 2 blocks
length64 : 31 bytes in 1 blocks
- newarray : 28 bytes in 1 blocks
- multipleinheritance: 24 bytes in 2 blocks
+ newarray : 32 bytes in 1 blocks
+ multipleinheritance: 48 bytes in 2 blocks
suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.
To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all
leak_check summary heuristics multipleinheritance
LEAK SUMMARY:
- definitely lost: 4 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 115 (+115) bytes in 4 (+4) blocks
- still reachable: 48 (-115) bytes in 4 (-4) blocks
+ possibly lost: 63 (+63) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,831 (-63) bytes in 6 (-2) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 0 (-56) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
- newarray : 0 (-28) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
- multipleinheritance: 24 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
+ newarray : 0 (-32) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
+ multipleinheritance: 48 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
leak_check summary any heuristics newarray
LEAK SUMMARY:
- definitely lost: 4 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 111 (-4) bytes in 5 (+1) blocks
- still reachable: 52 (+4) bytes in 3 (-1) blocks
+ possibly lost: 48 (-15) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,846 (+15) bytes in 6 (+0) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- newarray : 28 (+28) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
- multipleinheritance: 0 (-24) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
+ newarray : 63 (+63) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
+ multipleinheritance: 0 (-48) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
leak_check summary heuristics length64
LEAK SUMMARY:
- definitely lost: 4 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 108 (-3) bytes in 5 (+0) blocks
- still reachable: 55 (+3) bytes in 3 (+0) blocks
+ possibly lost: 80 (+32) bytes in 3 (+1) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,814 (-32) bytes in 5 (-1) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
length64 : 31 (+31) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
- newarray : 0 (-28) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
+ newarray : 0 (-63) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
leak_check summary heuristics stdstring
LEAK SUMMARY:
- definitely lost: 4 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 83 (-25) bytes in 4 (-1) blocks
- still reachable: 80 (+25) bytes in 4 (+1) blocks
+ possibly lost: 111 (+31) bytes in 4 (+1) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,783 (-31) bytes in 4 (-1) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 56 (+56) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
leak_check summary heuristics multipleinheritance,newarray,stdstring,length64
LEAK SUMMARY:
- definitely lost: 4 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.diff-64bit
=================================================
--- leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-64bit 2016-10-24 00:02:47.985023532 +0000
+++ leak_cpp_interior.stderr.out 2016-10-24 01:16:44.655023532 +0000
@@ -9,9 +9,8 @@
definitely lost: 8 bytes in 1 blocks
indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
- still reachable: 239 bytes in 8 blocks
+ still reachable: 72,894 bytes in 8 blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 80 bytes in 2 blocks
length64 : 31 bytes in 1 blocks
newarray : 32 bytes in 1 blocks
multipleinheritance: 48 bytes in 2 blocks
@@ -23,10 +22,9 @@
LEAK SUMMARY:
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 143 (+143) bytes in 4 (+4) blocks
- still reachable: 96 (-143) bytes in 4 (-4) blocks
+ possibly lost: 63 (+63) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,831 (-63) bytes in 6 (-2) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 0 (-80) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
newarray : 0 (-32) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
multipleinheritance: 48 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
@@ -37,8 +35,8 @@
LEAK SUMMARY:
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 128 (-15) bytes in 4 (+0) blocks
- still reachable: 111 (+15) bytes in 4 (+0) blocks
+ possibly lost: 48 (-15) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,846 (+15) bytes in 6 (+0) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
newarray : 63 (+63) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
multipleinheritance: 0 (-48) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
@@ -49,8 +47,8 @@
LEAK SUMMARY:
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 160 (+32) bytes in 5 (+1) blocks
- still reachable: 79 (-32) bytes in 3 (-1) blocks
+ possibly lost: 80 (+32) bytes in 3 (+1) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,814 (-32) bytes in 5 (-1) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
length64 : 31 (+31) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
newarray : 0 (-63) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
@@ -61,10 +59,9 @@
LEAK SUMMARY:
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 111 (-49) bytes in 4 (-1) blocks
- still reachable: 128 (+49) bytes in 4 (+1) blocks
+ possibly lost: 111 (+31) bytes in 4 (+1) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,783 (-31) bytes in 4 (-1) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 80 (+80) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
@@ -74,9 +71,8 @@
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
possibly lost: 0 (-111) bytes in 0 (-4) blocks
- still reachable: 239 (+111) bytes in 8 (+4) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,894 (+111) bytes in 8 (+4) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 80 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
length64 : 31 (+31) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
newarray : 32 (+32) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
multipleinheritance: 48 (+48) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
@@ -88,9 +84,8 @@
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
possibly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- still reachable: 239 (+0) bytes in 8 (+0) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,894 (+0) bytes in 8 (+0) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 80 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
length64 : 31 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
newarray : 32 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
multipleinheritance: 48 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
@@ -101,10 +96,9 @@
LEAK SUMMARY:
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 191 (+191) bytes in 6 (+6) blocks
- still reachable: 48 (-191) bytes in 2 (-6) blocks
+ possibly lost: 111 (+111) bytes in 4 (+4) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,783 (-111) bytes in 4 (-4) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 0 (-80) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
newarray : 0 (-32) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
multipleinheritance: 0 (-48) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
@@ -133,10 +127,16 @@
Finished!
HEAP SUMMARY:
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.diff-64bit-solaris
=================================================
--- leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-64bit-solaris 2016-10-24 00:01:54.345023532 +0000
+++ leak_cpp_interior.stderr.out 2016-10-24 01:16:44.655023532 +0000
@@ -9,9 +9,8 @@
definitely lost: 8 bytes in 1 blocks
indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
- still reachable: 273 bytes in 8 blocks
+ still reachable: 72,894 bytes in 8 blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 114 bytes in 2 blocks
length64 : 31 bytes in 1 blocks
newarray : 32 bytes in 1 blocks
multipleinheritance: 48 bytes in 2 blocks
@@ -23,10 +22,9 @@
LEAK SUMMARY:
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 177 (+177) bytes in 4 (+4) blocks
- still reachable: 96 (-177) bytes in 4 (-4) blocks
+ possibly lost: 63 (+63) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,831 (-63) bytes in 6 (-2) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 0 (-114) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
newarray : 0 (-32) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
multipleinheritance: 48 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
@@ -37,8 +35,8 @@
LEAK SUMMARY:
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 162 (-15) bytes in 4 (+0) blocks
- still reachable: 111 (+15) bytes in 4 (+0) blocks
+ possibly lost: 48 (-15) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,846 (+15) bytes in 6 (+0) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
newarray : 63 (+63) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
multipleinheritance: 0 (-48) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
@@ -49,8 +47,8 @@
LEAK SUMMARY:
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 194 (+32) bytes in 5 (+1) blocks
- still reachable: 79 (-32) bytes in 3 (-1) blocks
+ possibly lost: 80 (+32) bytes in 3 (+1) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,814 (-32) bytes in 5 (-1) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
length64 : 31 (+31) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
newarray : 0 (-63) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
@@ -61,10 +59,9 @@
LEAK SUMMARY:
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 111 (-83) bytes in 4 (-1) blocks
- still reachable: 162 (+83) bytes in 4 (+1) blocks
+ possibly lost: 111 (+31) bytes in 4 (+1) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,783 (-31) bytes in 4 (-1) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 114 (+114) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
@@ -74,9 +71,8 @@
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
possibly lost: 0 (-111) bytes in 0 (-4) blocks
- still reachable: 273 (+111) bytes in 8 (+4) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,894 (+111) bytes in 8 (+4) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 114 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
length64 : 31 (+31) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
newarray : 32 (+32) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
multipleinheritance: 48 (+48) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
@@ -88,9 +84,8 @@
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
possibly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- still reachable: 273 (+0) bytes in 8 (+0) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,894 (+0) bytes in 8 (+0) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 114 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
length64 : 31 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
newarray : 32 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
multipleinheritance: 48 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
@@ -101,10 +96,9 @@
LEAK SUMMARY:
definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 225 (+225) bytes in 6 (+6) blocks
- still reachable: 48 (-225) bytes in 2 (-6) blocks
+ possibly lost: 111 (+111) bytes in 4 (+4) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,783 (-111) bytes in 4 (-4) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 0 (-114) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
newarray : 0 (-32) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
multipleinheritance: 0 (-48) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
@@ -133,10 +127,16 @@
Finished!
HEAP SUMMARY:
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior.stderr.diff-solaris
=================================================
--- leak_cpp_interior.stderr.exp-solaris 2016-10-24 00:04:39.695023532 +0000
+++ leak_cpp_interior.stderr.out 2016-10-24 01:16:44.655023532 +0000
@@ -1,118 +1,112 @@
valgrind output will go to log
VALGRIND_DO_LEAK_CHECK
-4 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
+8 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ...
by 0x........: doit() (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:115)
by 0x........: main (leak_cpp_interior.cpp:130)
LEAK SUMMARY:
- definitely lost: 4 bytes in 1 blocks
+ definitely lost: 8 bytes in 1 blocks
indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
- still reachable: 197 bytes in 8 blocks
+ still reachable: 72,894 bytes in 8 blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 90 bytes in 2 blocks
length64 : 31 bytes in 1 blocks
- newarray : 28 bytes in 1 blocks
- multipleinheritance: 24 bytes in 2 blocks
+ newarray : 32 bytes in 1 blocks
+ multipleinheritance: 48 bytes in 2 blocks
suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.
To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all
leak_check summary heuristics multipleinheritance
LEAK SUMMARY:
- definitely lost: 4 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 149 (+149) bytes in 4 (+4) blocks
- still reachable: 48 (-149) bytes in 4 (-4) blocks
+ possibly lost: 63 (+63) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,831 (-63) bytes in 6 (-2) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 0 (-90) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
- newarray : 0 (-28) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
- multipleinheritance: 24 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
+ newarray : 0 (-32) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
+ multipleinheritance: 48 (+0) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
leak_check summary any heuristics newarray
LEAK SUMMARY:
- definitely lost: 4 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 145 (-4) bytes in 5 (+1) blocks
- still reachable: 52 (+4) bytes in 3 (-1) blocks
+ possibly lost: 48 (-15) bytes in 2 (+0) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,846 (+15) bytes in 6 (+0) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- newarray : 28 (+28) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
- multipleinheritance: 0 (-24) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
+ newarray : 63 (+63) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
+ multipleinheritance: 0 (-48) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
leak_check summary heuristics length64
LEAK SUMMARY:
- definitely lost: 4 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 142 (-3) bytes in 5 (+0) blocks
- still reachable: 55 (+3) bytes in 3 (+0) blocks
+ possibly lost: 80 (+32) bytes in 3 (+1) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,814 (-32) bytes in 5 (-1) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
length64 : 31 (+31) bytes in 1 (+1) blocks
- newarray : 0 (-28) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
+ newarray : 0 (-63) bytes in 0 (-2) blocks
suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
leak_check summary heuristics stdstring
LEAK SUMMARY:
- definitely lost: 4 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
indirectly lost: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
- possibly lost: 83 (-59) bytes in 4 (-1) blocks
- still reachable: 114 (+59) bytes in 4 (+1) blocks
+ possibly lost: 111 (+31) bytes in 4 (+1) blocks
+ still reachable: 72,783 (-31) bytes in 4 (-1) blocks
of which reachable via heuristic:
- stdstring : 90 (+90) bytes in 2 (+2) blocks
length64 : 0 (-31) bytes in 0 (-1) blocks
suppressed: 0 (+0) bytes in 0 (+0) blocks
To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check
leak_check summary heuristics multipleinheritance,newarray,stdstring,length64
LEAK SUMMARY:
- definitely lost: 4 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
+ definitely lost: 8 (+0) bytes in 1 (+0) blocks
<truncated beyond 100 lines>
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/memcmptest.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- memcmptest.stderr.exp 2016-10-24 00:05:04.235023532 +0000
+++ memcmptest.stderr.out 2016-10-24 01:17:30.375023532 +0000
@@ -1,4 +1,8 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
- at 0x........: memcmp (vg_replace_strmem.c:...)
+ at 0x........: bcmp (vg_replace_strmem.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (memcmptest.c:13)
+
+Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
+ at 0x........: bcmp (vg_replace_strmem.c:...)
by 0x........: main (memcmptest.c:13)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/memcmptest.stderr.diff2
=================================================
--- memcmptest.stderr.exp2 2016-10-24 00:05:04.215023532 +0000
+++ memcmptest.stderr.out 2016-10-24 01:17:30.375023532 +0000
@@ -2,3 +2,7 @@
at 0x........: bcmp (vg_replace_strmem.c:...)
by 0x........: main (memcmptest.c:13)
+Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
+ at 0x........: bcmp (vg_replace_strmem.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (memcmptest.c:13)
+
|