Re: [Valgrind-developers] AVX XSAVE/XRSTOR implemented

[Ivo R. <ivo...@gm...>]

2015-08-13 11:55 GMT+02:00 Julian Seward <js...@ac...>:

> On 13/08/15 08:23, Ivo Raisr wrote:
> > However I see the following failure:
> > perl tests/vg_regtest none/tests/amd64/xacq_xrel
>
> I'm not sure why that would have failed as a result of this change.
> But anyway.  Looking at that test, I think the inline assembly has
> always been wrong.  It mentions rdx twice but doesn't mention rbx at
> all; it should mention each exactly once.
>
> Can you try the diff below and see if you get the same results
> natively and on V ?  In both cases I now get (on Linux)
>
>   result for 'cmpxchg8b' is 55667788bbaa9988
>


Thank you for providing a fix for this test case.
Indeed, it is not caused by the recent change in AVX xsave/xrstor.
Now the test case passes successfully.
I.