Re: [Valgrind-users] Uninitialized access findings on non-static file scope variables that's been initialized?

[Bart V. A. <bva...@ac...>]

On 08/12/15 22:18, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> Its *really* pathetic the C++ language lacks a mechanism for me to say
> "Object 1 depends upon String 1, 2, 3", and "Object 2 depends upon
> Object 1 and String 1, 2, 3".

What's wrong with the singleton pattern ? When using the singleton 
pattern non-circular dependencies are resolved at runtime without having 
to specify the dependencies explicitly to the compiler.

Bart.