|
From: Will S. <wil...@vn...> - 2015-05-06 13:08:27
|
On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 01:06 +0200, Philippe Waroquiers wrote: > On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 16:56 -0500, Will Schmidt wrote: > > A handful of patches intended to clean up the valgrind regtest results as seen > > on powerpc platforms. I've locally been running against Fedora20 and > > Fedora21 installations, on Power6, Power7, and Power8 (LE and BE) platforms. > > With these changes in place, the tests are significantly cleaned up. > > > > At a high level, there are several spots where some ifdiffery needed to be > > updated to handle ppc64LE versus BE, and some new .exp files to handle > > the output generated on ppc64*. > Having better tests on ppc64 is nice. > I quickly looked at the patches. Only one remark: adding new .exp files > is not the preferred approach, as these different .exp files implies a > heavier maintenance that e.g. modifying a filter_xxxxxxx to ensure > the output is the same on all platforms. > Maybe some of these ppc64 specific .exp can be avoided/removed > by enhancing the filters ? Ok. And a-ha! :-) I had seen the filters, but something had not quite clicked yet for me there. At a glance at least some of the changes should be doable via the filters. It'll probably be a day or so before I can dig back in and rework things, so look for an updated patchset after a bit. Thanks, -Will > > > For info, I have setup a nightly regression test on gcc112. > The results of last night are: > == 585 tests, 6 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 1 stdoutB failure, 2 post failures == > gdbserver_tests/hgtls (stdoutB) > memcheck/tests/badjump2 (stderr) > memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior (stderr) > memcheck/tests/overlap (stderr) > memcheck/tests/supp_unknown (stderr) > massif/tests/big-alloc (post) > massif/tests/deep-D (post) > helgrind/tests/tc06_two_races_xml (stderr) > drd/tests/pth_create_chain (stderr) > > The results are not (yet?) reaching valgrind-testresults, due to > mail setup problems. > > Julian, > > I suspect that the results are not reaching > the result mailing list, because gcc112 puts > phi...@gc... > as mail originator. I could not configure my email address as > originator on this system. Support request was filed to gcc compile > farm admin but no feedback yet since more than a week. > > To solve that, would it be possible to add this email address to > the 'authorised users' of valgrind-testresults > but configuring it so that the posts are not sent to this > address. In other words, the mailing list should accept > mails from this address, but should not send the posts to > that address. > > Thanks > > Philippe > > |