|
From: Julian S. <js...@ac...> - 2015-02-03 13:39:25
|
On 02/02/15 18:21, Florian Krohm wrote: > Wrong. I missed this assignment (in pass #2 of preen_segments): > > nsegments[w] = nsegments[r]; I did wonder about this, yes. > That looks like significant enough improvement to me to allow an > occasional, if any, leak of a segment name. Hmm, the problem is, that gives us a new, if obscure, failure mode that didn't exist before. If a long running application dlopens and dlcloses some .so, is it possible to run out of string table space now? J |