Re: [Valgrind-users] Empty stack shown by Valgrind

[Philippe W. <phi...@sk...>]

On Fri, 2015-01-02 at 14:04 +0000, Tom Hughes wrote:

> Given that this is a leak report the other likely cause is that the 
> addresses are in a shared object that has been unloaded, though it's 
> surprising that none at all are translatable.
Yes, that is strange.
Effectively, maybe an unloaded shared object.

Or maybe some JIT-ted code ?
Is that a only a 'compiled executable' ?
Or does it contain a JIT, e.g. a Java or Javascript library ?

It looks also like the default limit of 12 callers is reached
at least for some stack traces.

> 
> Otherwise I would at least expect to see the object name.
Yes, you are correct : even for a stripped executable, the object
name is given.

Philippe