Re: [Valgrind-developers] Any objection if I add VG_(read_nanosecond_timer) as well as VG_(read_millisecond_timer)?

[Julian S. <js...@ac...>]

> The problem, at present, is that VG_(read_millisecond_timer) is the only
> timing routine I can see. The generic cache configuration detection routine
> is far more accurate if it is given microsecond or better accurate timing.
> So would it be okay if I add VG_(read_nanosecond_timer) returning a ULong?

How do you plan to implement VG_(read_nanosecond_timer) ?

J