Re: [Valgrind-users] building valgrind fails in m_cpuid.S

[Stephane A. <ste...@ca...>]

John Reiser <jreiser <at> bitwagon.com> writes:


> What is surprising about it?  Namely, what did you expect, and what
> is the difference with what you actually get?
> To me the output looks like a sane 64-bit environment,
> also with support for 32-bit executables.
> 

I was surprised to see amd as the primary when I have an Intel chip. Someone
explained it refers to the arch, not the chip, and thats probably your point
too, so no worry.


> 
> Those error messages (quoted above) look like the output
> which "gcc -m32" would give, namely compiling for 32-bit i686
> despite all the flags for 64-bit (namely "-DVGA_amd64=1" etc.)

And thats why Im an idiot and youre a genius. I changed my compiler and it
worked!!!!

Thank you so much.