Re: [Valgrind-developers] Ijk_EmFail

[Julian S. <js...@ac...>]

> (3) Like (2), reuse existing infrastructure but rename to use neutral
>     names, perhaps:
>     LibVEX_EmWarn_string --> LibVEX_EmNote_string
>     VEXEmWarn --> VEXEmNote
>     guest_EMWARN --> guest_EMNOTE
> 
> My choice in decreasing order of preference is:  3, 1, 2
> I include #3, because I don't have a handle on how many serious uses
> of VEX are out there that could be broken by the incompatible change in
> that choice. 

I have no idea either.  3 seems fine to me.

J