Re: [Valgrind-developers] Dealing with 32-byte loads/stores in Cachegrind/Callgrind

[Josef W. <Jos...@gm...>]

Am 04.06.2012 19:00, schrieb Julian Seward:
> second opinion.  It is a bit more complex than the Cachegrind case
> because in this case, the assertions re size fail if cache simulation
> is not selected, and so have to be "gated" on that condition.

You could have set CLG_(min_line_size) in any case, but it's ok this
way, too. It looks fine to me.

I just wondered about whether we do the right thing not really
taking I1 cache line size into account for calculating
CLG_(min_line_size).
But we actually do: according to the comment in cg_arch.c atop
the check against MIN_LINE_SIZE, it is set to 16 because that is
larger than any instruction.

Josef