Menu
▾
▴
[Valgrind-developers] 2012-05-17 22:20:14 EDT nightly build (z10-ec, s390x build on z10-EC)
|
From: <br...@ac...> - 2012-05-18 03:08:00
|
valgrind revision: 12567
VEX revision: 2329
C compiler: gcc (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-3)
Assembler: GNU assembler 2.15.92.0.2 20040927
C library: GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4
uname -mrs: Linux 2.6.9-42.EL s390x
Vendor version: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 4)
Nightly build on z10-ec ( s390x build on z10-EC )
Started at 2012-05-17 22:20:14 EDT
Ended at 2012-05-17 23:07:48 EDT
Results differ from 24 hours ago
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... failed
Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo
Checked out revision 12567.
At revision 2329.
Configuring valgrind ... cd valgrind-new && ./autogen.sh && ./configure --prefix=/opt/nightly/valgrind-new/Inst
running: aclocal
configure.in:1791: warning: macro `AM_COND_IF' not found in library
configure.in:1794: warning: macro `AM_COND_IF' not found in library
running: autoheader
running: automake -a
configure.in:152: installing `./config.sub'
configure.in:25: installing `./compile'
configure.in:14: installing `./missing'
configure.in:14: installing `./install-sh'
configure.in:152: installing `./config.guess'
Makefile.vex.am: installing `./depcomp'
running: autoconf
configure.in:1798: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_COND_IF
If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
See the Autoconf documentation.
error: while running 'autoconf'
=================================================
== Results from 24 hours ago ==
=================================================
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 500 tests, 8 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
memcheck/tests/manuel3 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr)
drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr)
drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
=================================================
== Difference between 24 hours ago and now ==
=================================================
*** old.short Thu May 17 22:51:24 2012
--- new.short Thu May 17 23:07:48 2012
***************
*** 2,18 ****
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
! Configuring valgrind ... done
! Building valgrind ... done
! Running regression tests ... failed
! Regression test results follow
!
! == 500 tests, 8 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
! memcheck/tests/manuel3 (stderr)
! memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok (stderr)
! memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr)
! helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
! helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse (stderr)
! helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr)
! drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr)
! drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
--- 2,25 ----
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
! Configuring valgrind ... failed
! Last 20 lines of verbose log follow echo
+ Checked out revision 12567.
+ At revision 2329.
+ Configuring valgrind ... cd valgrind-new && ./autogen.sh && ./configure --prefix=/opt/nightly/valgrind-new/Inst
+ running: aclocal
+ configure.in:1791: warning: macro `AM_COND_IF' not found in library
+ configure.in:1794: warning: macro `AM_COND_IF' not found in library
+ running: autoheader
+ running: automake -a
+ configure.in:152: installing `./config.sub'
+ configure.in:25: installing `./compile'
+ configure.in:14: installing `./missing'
+ configure.in:14: installing `./install-sh'
+ configure.in:152: installing `./config.guess'
+ Makefile.vex.am: installing `./depcomp'
+ running: autoconf
+ configure.in:1798: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_COND_IF
+ If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
+ See the Autoconf documentation.
+ error: while running 'autoconf'
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-ppc
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-ppc 2012-05-17 22:33:28.000000000 -0400
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2012-05-17 22:50:42.000000000 -0400
@@ -7,28 +7,22 @@
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:20)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+ at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
+ by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:47)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+ at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-x86
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-x86 2012-05-17 22:33:28.000000000 -0400
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2012-05-17 22:50:42.000000000 -0400
@@ -8,7 +8,8 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+ by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
@@ -16,19 +17,12 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+ by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc2.8
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc2.8 2012-05-17 22:33:28.000000000 -0400
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-05-17 22:50:46.000000000 -0400
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: (below main)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: (below main)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-ppc
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-ppc 2012-05-17 22:33:28.000000000 -0400
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-05-17 22:50:46.000000000 -0400
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-x86
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-x86 2012-05-17 22:33:28.000000000 -0400
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-05-17 22:50:46.000000000 -0400
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp 2012-05-17 22:22:59.000000000 -0400
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-05-17 22:47:01.000000000 -0400
@@ -42,14 +42,6 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-
---------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -110,16 +102,8 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 11 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 9 errors from 9 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc18_semabuse.stderr.exp 2012-05-17 22:22:59.000000000 -0400
+++ tc18_semabuse.stderr.out 2012-05-17 22:47:09.000000000 -0400
@@ -18,13 +18,5 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:34)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:37)
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp 2012-05-17 22:22:59.000000000 -0400
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2012-05-17 22:47:18.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
------- This is output for >= glibc 2.4 ------
+------ This is output for < glibc 2.4 ------
---------------- pthread_create/join ----------------
@@ -45,13 +45,6 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_init failed
- with error code 95 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:92)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
Thread #x: pthread_mutex_destroy of a locked mutex
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:102)
@@ -63,26 +56,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:102)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_lock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:108)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_trylock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_trylock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:116)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_timedlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_timedlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:121)
+make pthread_mutex_lock fail: skipped on glibc < 2.4
----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -90,13 +65,6 @@
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:125)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:125)
-
---------------- pthread_cond_wait et al ----------------
@@ -215,14 +183,6 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:242)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:245)
-
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
@@ -235,4 +195,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 17 errors from 17 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/manuel3.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- manuel3.stderr.exp 2012-05-17 22:26:28.000000000 -0400
+++ manuel3.stderr.out 2012-05-17 22:42:07.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
- at 0x........: gcc_cant_inline_me (manuel3.c:22)
- by 0x........: main (manuel3.c:14)
+ at 0x........: main (manuel3.c:12)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- partial_load_ok.stderr.exp 2012-05-17 22:26:28.000000000 -0400
+++ partial_load_ok.stderr.out 2012-05-17 22:42:37.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,7 +1,13 @@
-Invalid read of size 4
+Invalid read of size 1
+ at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:16)
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after a block of size 7 alloc'd
+ at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:14)
+
+Invalid read of size 8
at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:23)
- Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 4 alloc'd
+ Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 8 alloc'd
at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:20)
@@ -11,9 +17,9 @@
at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:28)
-Invalid read of size 4
+Invalid read of size 8
at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:37)
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 4 free'd
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 8 free'd
at 0x........: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:36)
@@ -25,4 +31,4 @@
For a detailed leak analysis, rerun with: --leak-check=full
For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok.stderr.diff64
=================================================
--- partial_load_ok.stderr.exp64 2012-05-17 22:26:28.000000000 -0400
+++ partial_load_ok.stderr.out 2012-05-17 22:42:37.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,4 +1,10 @@
+Invalid read of size 1
+ at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:16)
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after a block of size 7 alloc'd
+ at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:14)
+
Invalid read of size 8
at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:23)
Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 8 alloc'd
@@ -25,4 +31,4 @@
For a detailed leak analysis, rerun with: --leak-check=full
For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp 2012-05-17 22:26:28.000000000 -0400
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2012-05-17 22:43:32.000000000 -0400
@@ -7,8 +7,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (varinfo6.c:4860)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (varinfo6.c:5667)
by 0x........: main (varinfo6.c:6517)
- Location 0x........ is 2 bytes inside local var "budget"
- declared at varinfo6.c:3115, in frame #2 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff-ppc64
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp-ppc64 2012-05-17 22:26:28.000000000 -0400
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2012-05-17 22:43:32.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: mainSort (varinfo6.c:2999)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (varinfo6.c:3143)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (varinfo6.c:4072)
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (varinfo6.c:1699)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (varinfo6.c:5230)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (varinfo6.c:5715)
|
