[Valgrind-developers] 2012-04-13 22:20:13 EDT nightly build (z10-ec, s390x build on z10-EC)

SourceForge Headquarters 1320 Columbia Street Suite 310 San Diego, CA 92101 +1 (858) 422-6466

valgrind revision: 12504
VEX revision:      2283
C compiler:        gcc (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-3)
Assembler:         GNU assembler 2.15.92.0.2 20040927
C library:         GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4
uname -mrs:        Linux 2.6.9-42.EL s390x
Vendor version:    Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 4)

Nightly build on z10-ec ( s390x build on z10-EC )
Started at 2012-04-13 22:20:13 EDT
Ended   at 2012-04-13 22:55:27 EDT
Results differ from 24 hours ago

   Checking out valgrind source tree  ... done
   Configuring valgrind               ... done
   Building valgrind                  ... done
   Running regression tests           ... failed

Regression test results follow

== 489 tests, 8 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
memcheck/tests/manuel3                   (stderr)
memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok           (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo6                  (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock           (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse             (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap           (stderr)
drd/tests/tc04_free_lock                 (stderr)
drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock                (stderr)

=================================================
== Results from 24 hours ago                   ==
=================================================

   Checking out valgrind source tree  ... done
   Configuring valgrind               ... done
   Building valgrind                  ... done
   Running regression tests           ... failed

Regression test results follow

== 489 tests, 9 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
memcheck/tests/manuel3                   (stderr)
memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok           (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo6                  (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock           (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc14_laog_dinphils        (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse             (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap           (stderr)
drd/tests/tc04_free_lock                 (stderr)
drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock                (stderr)


=================================================
== Difference between 24 hours ago and now     ==
=================================================

*** old.short	Fri Apr 13 22:38:01 2012

--- new.short	Fri Apr 13 22:55:27 2012
***************
*** 8,10 ****
  
! == 489 tests, 9 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
  memcheck/tests/manuel3                   (stderr)
--- 8,10 ----
  
! == 489 tests, 8 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
  memcheck/tests/manuel3                   (stderr)
***************
*** 13,15 ****
  helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock           (stderr)
- helgrind/tests/tc14_laog_dinphils        (stderr)
  helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse             (stderr)
--- 13,14 ----

  
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-ppc
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-ppc	2012-04-13 22:38:48.000000000 -0400
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out	2012-04-13 22:54:39.000000000 -0400
@@ -7,28 +7,22 @@
    by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:20)
 
 Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
-   at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
-   by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+   at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
+   by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+   by 0x........: ???
 mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
    at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
    by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
    by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
 
 Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
-   at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:47)
-   by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+   at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
+   by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+   by 0x........: ???
 mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
    at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
    by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
    by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
 
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
-   at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
-   by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
-   at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-   by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
-   by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
 
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-x86
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-x86	2012-04-13 22:38:48.000000000 -0400
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out	2012-04-13 22:54:39.000000000 -0400
@@ -8,7 +8,8 @@
 
 Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
    at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
-   by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+   by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+   by 0x........: ???
 mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
    at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
    by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
@@ -16,19 +17,12 @@
 
 Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
    at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
-   by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+   by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+   by 0x........: ???
 mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
    at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
    by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
    by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
 
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
-   at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
-   by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
-   at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-   by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
-   by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
 
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc2.8
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc2.8	2012-04-13 22:38:48.000000000 -0400
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out	2012-04-13 22:54:44.000000000 -0400
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
 
 Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
    at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
-   by 0x........: (below main)
+   by 0x........: ???
 mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
    at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
    by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
    by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
    by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
 
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
-   at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
-   by 0x........: (below main)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
-   at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-   by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
-   by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
 
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-ppc
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-ppc	2012-04-13 22:38:48.000000000 -0400
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out	2012-04-13 22:54:44.000000000 -0400
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
    by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
 
 Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
-   at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
-   by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+   at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
+   by 0x........: ???
 mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
    at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
    by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
    by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
    by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
 
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
-   at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
-   by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
-   at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-   by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
-   by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
 
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-x86
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-x86	2012-04-13 22:38:48.000000000 -0400
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out	2012-04-13 22:54:44.000000000 -0400
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
 
 Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
    at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
-   by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+   by 0x........: ???
 mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
    at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
    by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
    by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
    by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
 
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
-   at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
-   by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
-   at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-   by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
-   by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
 
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp	2012-04-13 22:38:06.000000000 -0400
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out	2012-04-13 22:50:42.000000000 -0400
@@ -42,14 +42,6 @@
    by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
    by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
-   with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
-   at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
-   by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
-   by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-
 ---------------------
 ----------------------------------------------------------------
 
@@ -110,16 +102,8 @@
 
 ----------------------------------------------------------------
 
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
-   with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
-   at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
-   by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
-   by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
 Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
    ...
 
 
-ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 11 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 9 errors from 9 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc18_semabuse.stderr.exp	2012-04-13 22:38:06.000000000 -0400
+++ tc18_semabuse.stderr.out	2012-04-13 22:50:51.000000000 -0400
@@ -18,13 +18,5 @@
    by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
    by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:34)
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
 
-Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
-   with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
-   at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
-   by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
-   by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:37)
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp	2012-04-13 22:38:06.000000000 -0400
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out	2012-04-13 22:51:01.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 
 
 
------- This is output for >= glibc 2.4 ------
+------ This is output for < glibc 2.4 ------
 
 ---------------- pthread_create/join ----------------
 
@@ -45,13 +45,6 @@
 
 ----------------------------------------------------------------
 
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_init failed
-   with error code 95 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
-   at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
-   by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:92)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
 Thread #x: pthread_mutex_destroy of a locked mutex
    at 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
    by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:102)
@@ -63,26 +56,8 @@
    at 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
    by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:102)
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_lock failed
-   with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
-   at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
-   by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:108)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
 
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_trylock failed
-   with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
-   at 0x........: pthread_mutex_trylock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
-   by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:116)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_timedlock failed
-   with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
-   at 0x........: pthread_mutex_timedlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
-   by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:121)
+make pthread_mutex_lock fail: skipped on glibc < 2.4
 
 ----------------------------------------------------------------
 
@@ -90,13 +65,6 @@
    at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
    by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:125)
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
-   with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
-   at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
-   by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:125)
-
 
 ---------------- pthread_cond_wait et al ----------------
 
@@ -215,14 +183,6 @@
    by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
    by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:242)
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
-   with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
-   at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
-   by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
-   by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:245)
-
 
 FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
 
@@ -235,4 +195,4 @@
    ...
 
 
-ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 17 errors from 17 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/manuel3.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- manuel3.stderr.exp	2012-04-13 22:38:14.000000000 -0400
+++ manuel3.stderr.out	2012-04-13 22:44:48.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
 Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
-   at 0x........: gcc_cant_inline_me (manuel3.c:22)
-   by 0x........: main (manuel3.c:14)
+   at 0x........: main (manuel3.c:12)
 
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- partial_load_ok.stderr.exp	2012-04-13 22:38:14.000000000 -0400
+++ partial_load_ok.stderr.out	2012-04-13 22:45:31.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,7 +1,13 @@
 
-Invalid read of size 4
+Invalid read of size 1
+   at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:16)
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after a block of size 7 alloc'd
+   at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+   by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:14)
+
+Invalid read of size 8
    at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:23)
- Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 4 alloc'd
+ Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 8 alloc'd
    at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
    by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:20)
 
@@ -11,9 +17,9 @@
    at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
    by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:28)
 
-Invalid read of size 4
+Invalid read of size 8
    at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:37)
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 4 free'd
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 8 free'd
    at 0x........: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
    by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:36)
 
@@ -25,4 +31,4 @@
 For a detailed leak analysis, rerun with: --leak-check=full
 
 For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok.stderr.diff64
=================================================
--- partial_load_ok.stderr.exp64	2012-04-13 22:38:14.000000000 -0400
+++ partial_load_ok.stderr.out	2012-04-13 22:45:31.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,4 +1,10 @@
 
+Invalid read of size 1
+   at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:16)
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after a block of size 7 alloc'd
+   at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+   by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:14)
+
 Invalid read of size 8
    at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:23)
  Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 8 alloc'd
@@ -25,4 +31,4 @@
 For a detailed leak analysis, rerun with: --leak-check=full
 
 For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp	2012-04-13 22:38:14.000000000 -0400
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out	2012-04-13 22:46:38.000000000 -0400
@@ -7,8 +7,7 @@
    by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (varinfo6.c:4860)
    by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (varinfo6.c:5667)
    by 0x........: main (varinfo6.c:6517)
- Location 0x........ is 2 bytes inside local var "budget"
- declared at varinfo6.c:3115, in frame #2 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
 
 Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
    at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff-ppc64
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp-ppc64	2012-04-13 22:38:14.000000000 -0400
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out	2012-04-13 22:46:38.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
-   at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+   at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
    by 0x........: mainSort (varinfo6.c:2999)
    by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (varinfo6.c:3143)
    by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (varinfo6.c:4072)
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
  Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
 
 Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
-   at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+   at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
    by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (varinfo6.c:1699)
    by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (varinfo6.c:5230)
    by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (varinfo6.c:5715)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-ppc
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-ppc	2012-04-13 22:21:17.000000000 -0400
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out	2012-04-13 22:37:13.000000000 -0400
@@ -7,28 +7,22 @@
    by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:20)
 
 Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
-   at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
-   by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+   at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
+   by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+   by 0x........: ???
 mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
    at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
    by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
    by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
 
 Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
-   at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:47)
-   by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+   at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
+   by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+   by 0x........: ???
 mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
    at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
    by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
    by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
 
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
-   at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
-   by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
-   at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-   by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
-   by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
 
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-x86
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-x86	2012-04-13 22:21:17.000000000 -0400
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out	2012-04-13 22:37:13.000000000 -0400
@@ -8,7 +8,8 @@
 
 Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
    at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
-   by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+   by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+   by 0x........: ???
 mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
    at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
    by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
@@ -16,19 +17,12 @@
 
 Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
    at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
-   by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+   by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+   by 0x........: ???
 mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
    at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
    by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
    by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
 
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
-   at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
-   by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
-   at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-   by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
-   by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
 
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc2.8
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc2.8	2012-04-13 22:21:17.000000000 -0400
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out	2012-04-13 22:37:17.000000000 -0400
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
 
 Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
    at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
-   by 0x........: (below main)
+   by 0x........: ???
 mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
    at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
    by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
    by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
    by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
 
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
-   at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
-   by 0x........: (below main)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
-   at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-   by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
-   by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
 
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-ppc
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-ppc	2012-04-13 22:21:17.000000000 -0400
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out	2012-04-13 22:37:17.000000000 -0400
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
    by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
 
 Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
-   at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
-   by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+   at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
+   by 0x........: ???
 mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
    at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
    by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
    by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
    by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
 
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
-   at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
-   by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
-   at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-   by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
-   by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
 
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-x86
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-x86	2012-04-13 22:21:17.000000000 -0400
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out	2012-04-13 22:37:17.000000000 -0400
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
 
 Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
    at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
-   by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+   by 0x........: ???
 mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
    at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
    by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
    by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
    by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
 
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
-   at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
-   by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
-   at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
-   by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
-   by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
 
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp	2012-04-13 22:20:35.000000000 -0400
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out	2012-04-13 22:33:15.000000000 -0400
@@ -42,14 +42,6 @@
    by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
    by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
-   with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
-   at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
-   by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
-   by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-
 ---------------------
 ----------------------------------------------------------------
 
@@ -110,16 +102,8 @@
 
 ----------------------------------------------------------------
 
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
-   with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
-   at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
-   by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
-   by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
 Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
    ...
 
 
-ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 11 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 9 errors from 9 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc14_laog_dinphils.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc14_laog_dinphils.stderr.exp	2012-04-13 22:20:35.000000000 -0400
+++ tc14_laog_dinphils.stderr.out	2012-04-13 22:33:21.000000000 -0400
@@ -20,5 +20,26 @@
    by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
    ...
 
+---Thread-Announcement------------------------------------------
 
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1000 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+Thread #x was created
+   ...
+   by 0x........: pthread_create_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+   by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+   by 0x........: main (tc14_laog_dinphils.c:34)
+
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x: lock order "0x........ before 0x........" violated
+
+Observed (incorrect) order is: acquisition of lock at 0x........
+   (stack unavailable)
+
+ followed by a later acquisition of lock at 0x........
+   at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+   by 0x........: dine (tc14_laog_dinphils.c:19)
+   by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+   ...
+
+
+ERROR SUMMARY: 1048 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc18_semabuse.stderr.exp	2012-04-13 22:20:35.000000000 -0400
+++ tc18_semabuse.stderr.out	2012-04-13 22:33:25.000000000 -0400
@@ -18,13 +18,5 @@
    by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
    by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:34)
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
 
-Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
-   with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
-   at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
-   by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
-   by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:37)
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp	2012-04-13 22:20:35.000000000 -0400
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out	2012-04-13 22:33:35.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 
 
 
------- This is output for >= glibc 2.4 ------
+------ This is output for < glibc 2.4 ------
 
 ---------------- pthread_create/join ----------------
 
@@ -45,13 +45,6 @@
 
 ----------------------------------------------------------------
 
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_init failed
-   with error code 95 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
-   at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
-   by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:92)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
 Thread #x: pthread_mutex_destroy of a locked mutex
    at 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
    by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:102)
@@ -63,26 +56,8 @@
    at 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
    by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:102)
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_lock failed
-   with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
-   at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
-   by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:108)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
 
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_trylock failed
-   with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
-   at 0x........: pthread_mutex_trylock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
-   by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:116)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_timedlock failed
-   with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
-   at 0x........: pthread_mutex_timedlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
-   by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:121)
+make pthread_mutex_lock fail: skipped on glibc < 2.4
 
 ----------------------------------------------------------------
 
@@ -90,13 +65,6 @@
    at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
    by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:125)
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
-   with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
-   at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
-   by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:125)
-
 
 ---------------- pthread_cond_wait et al ----------------
 
@@ -215,14 +183,6 @@
    by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
    by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:242)
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
-   with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
-   at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
-   by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
-   by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:245)
-
 
 FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
 
@@ -235,4 +195,4 @@
    ...
 
 
-ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 17 errors from 17 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/manuel3.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- manuel3.stderr.exp	2012-04-13 22:20:43.000000000 -0400
+++ manuel3.stderr.out	2012-04-13 22:27:18.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
 Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
-   at 0x........: gcc_cant_inline_me (manuel3.c:22)
-   by 0x........: main (manuel3.c:14)
+   at 0x........: main (manuel3.c:12)
 
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- partial_load_ok.stderr.exp	2012-04-13 22:20:43.000000000 -0400
+++ partial_load_ok.stderr.out	2012-04-13 22:28:00.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,7 +1,13 @@
 
-Invalid read of size 4
+Invalid read of size 1
+   at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:16)
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after a block of size 7 alloc'd
+   at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+   by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:14)
+
+Invalid read of size 8
    at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:23)
- Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 4 alloc'd
+ Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 8 alloc'd
    at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
    by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:20)
 
@@ -11,9 +17,9 @@
    at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
    by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:28)
 
-Invalid read of size 4
+Invalid read of size 8
    at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:37)
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 4 free'd
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 8 free'd
    at 0x........: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
    by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:36)
 
@@ -25,4 +31,4 @@
 For a detailed leak analysis, rerun with: --leak-check=full
 
 For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok.stderr.diff64
=================================================
--- partial_load_ok.stderr.exp64	2012-04-13 22:20:43.000000000 -0400
+++ partial_load_ok.stderr.out	2012-04-13 22:28:00.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,4 +1,10 @@
 
+Invalid read of size 1
+   at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:16)
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after a block of size 7 alloc'd
+   at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+   by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:14)
+
 Invalid read of size 8
    at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:23)
  Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 8 alloc'd
@@ -25,4 +31,4 @@
 For a detailed leak analysis, rerun with: --leak-check=full
 
 For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp	2012-04-13 22:20:43.000000000 -0400
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out	2012-04-13 22:29:06.000000000 -0400
@@ -7,8 +7,7 @@
    by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (varinfo6.c:4860)
    by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (varinfo6.c:5667)
    by 0x........: main (varinfo6.c:6517)
- Location 0x........ is 2 bytes inside local var "budget"
- declared at varinfo6.c:3115, in frame #2 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
 
 Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
    at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff-ppc64
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp-ppc64	2012-04-13 22:20:43.000000000 -0400
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out	2012-04-13 22:29:06.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
-   at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+   at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
    by 0x........: mainSort (varinfo6.c:2999)
    by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (varinfo6.c:3143)
    by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (varinfo6.c:4072)
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
  Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
 
 Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
-   at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+   at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
    by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (varinfo6.c:1699)
    by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (varinfo6.c:5230)
    by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (varinfo6.c:5715)


