Menu
▾
▴
Re: [Valgrind-users] Architecture Issue for Installation
|
From: David C. <dcc...@ac...> - 2012-03-15 20:07:08
|
On 3/15/2012 12:14 PM, Ian Mallett wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:29 PM, David Chapman <dcc...@ac... > <mailto:dcc...@ac...>> wrote: > > On 3/15/2012 11:01 AM, Ian Mallett wrote: >> Actual terminal output: >> >> ian@IanMallettU86:~/Desktop/C++/glLibC2/build$ valgrind /bin/ls > > What does "file /bin/ls" print? Your copy of "ls" may be a 32-bit > executable even if you are running on a 64-bit machine. (On my > CentOS 5.5 machine it is a 64-bit executable, but you never know...) > > Ah . . . I think that's it; the file I was trying to check was built > on a different, 64-bit machine, and this is running on a virtual > 32-bit machine. > > ian@IanMallettU86:~/Desktop/C++/glLibC2/build$ file /bin/ls > /bin/ls: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), > dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.8, stripped > ian@IanMallettU86:~/Desktop/C++/glLibC2/build$ file ./glLibC2 > ./glLibC2: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.15, not stripped > > So, I don't suppose there's any option to get a Valgrind 64-bit > installation for 32-bit that would actually work? I'd have to get a > 64-bit OS, then. I need a 64-bit distro of Ubuntu 9.04 . . . hmmmmm. Well, running a 64-bit application under a 32-bit OS is kind of hard. ;-) >> ==3359== Using valgrind-3.4.1-Debian, a dynamic binary >> instrumentation framework. > > Hmmm. Like I said, I sudo apt-get installed that. How else can I get > an up-to-date version? > > Thanks, > Ian valgrind runs as a user executable, so you can download and compile the new version at http://www.valgrind.org/ and install it locally. Of course, if you have root access on your virtual machine you can install it in /usr/local/bin. -- David Chapman dcc...@ac... Chapman Consulting -- San Jose, CA Software Development Done Right. www.chapman-consulting-sj.com |
