|
From: Philippe W. <phi...@sk...> - 2012-02-15 22:38:08
|
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 23:58 +0000, Rob wrote: > > Hmm, this doesn't sound like it's going to be simple to fix in > > a clean way. > > > > For the moment, can we do the incremental fix of taking Philippe's > > patch (with the off-by-one fixed) ? That's a very simple patch > > and uncontroversial patch. (Maybe should also backport it for > > 3.7.1 ?) > > Sounds good to me. This is still a big improvement. fixed in revision 12388. > > With this, gdbserver would be invoked either when the error nr is>= --vgdb-error > > or when it matches an error described in --vgdb-error-list. > > The --vgdb-error-list=<filename> will use the same format as a suppression file. > > > > Even better! I think this is a good combination of options and should > suit most eventualities. Not doing this for the moment (waiting for more feedback/more demands). Let's see if the easy patch is good enough for the moment ... Thanks Philippe |