Menu
▾
▴
[Valgrind-developers] 2012-01-15 19:30:52 EST nightly build (z900, s390x build on z900)
|
From: <br...@ac...> - 2012-01-16 03:59:57
|
valgrind revision: 12335
VEX revision: 2238
C compiler: gcc (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-3)
Assembler: GNU assembler 2.15.92.0.2 20040927
C library: GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4
uname -mrs: Linux 2.6.9-42.EL s390x
Vendor version: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 4)
Nightly build on z900 ( s390x build on z900 )
Started at 2012-01-15 19:30:52 EST
Ended at 2012-01-15 23:07:35 EST
Results differ from 24 hours ago
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 479 tests, 9 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
memcheck/tests/manuel3 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc14_laog_dinphils (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr)
drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr)
drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
=================================================
== Results from 24 hours ago ==
=================================================
Checking out valgrind source tree ... done
Configuring valgrind ... done
Building valgrind ... done
Running regression tests ... failed
Regression test results follow
== 478 tests, 9 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
memcheck/tests/manuel3 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok (stderr)
memcheck/tests/varinfo6 (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc14_laog_dinphils (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse (stderr)
helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap (stderr)
drd/tests/tc04_free_lock (stderr)
drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock (stderr)
=================================================
== Difference between 24 hours ago and now ==
=================================================
*** old.short Sun Jan 15 21:19:21 2012
--- new.short Sun Jan 15 23:07:35 2012
***************
*** 8,10 ****
! == 478 tests, 9 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
memcheck/tests/manuel3 (stderr)
--- 8,10 ----
! == 479 tests, 9 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 0 stdoutB failures, 0 post failures ==
memcheck/tests/manuel3 (stderr)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-ppc
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-ppc 2012-01-15 21:20:20.000000000 -0500
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2012-01-15 23:03:54.000000000 -0500
@@ -7,28 +7,22 @@
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:20)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+ at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
+ by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:47)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+ at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-x86
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-x86 2012-01-15 21:20:20.000000000 -0500
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2012-01-15 23:03:54.000000000 -0500
@@ -8,7 +8,8 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+ by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
@@ -16,19 +17,12 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+ by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc2.8
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc2.8 2012-01-15 21:20:20.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-01-15 23:04:19.000000000 -0500
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: (below main)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: (below main)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-ppc
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-ppc 2012-01-15 21:20:20.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-01-15 23:04:19.000000000 -0500
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-x86
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-x86 2012-01-15 21:20:20.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-01-15 23:04:19.000000000 -0500
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp 2012-01-15 21:19:30.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-01-15 22:39:55.000000000 -0500
@@ -42,14 +42,6 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-
---------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -110,16 +102,8 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 11 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 9 errors from 9 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc14_laog_dinphils.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc14_laog_dinphils.stderr.exp 2012-01-15 21:19:30.000000000 -0500
+++ tc14_laog_dinphils.stderr.out 2012-01-15 22:40:32.000000000 -0500
@@ -20,5 +20,26 @@
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
+---Thread-Announcement------------------------------------------
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1000 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+Thread #x was created
+ ...
+ by 0x........: pthread_create_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc14_laog_dinphils.c:34)
+
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x: lock order "0x........ before 0x........" violated
+
+Observed (incorrect) order is: acquisition of lock at 0x........
+ (stack unavailable)
+
+ followed by a later acquisition of lock at 0x........
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: dine (tc14_laog_dinphils.c:19)
+ by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+
+
+ERROR SUMMARY: 1048 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc18_semabuse.stderr.exp 2012-01-15 21:19:29.000000000 -0500
+++ tc18_semabuse.stderr.out 2012-01-15 22:41:00.000000000 -0500
@@ -18,13 +18,5 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:34)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:37)
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp 2012-01-15 21:19:29.000000000 -0500
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2012-01-15 22:42:23.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
------- This is output for >= glibc 2.4 ------
+------ This is output for < glibc 2.4 ------
---------------- pthread_create/join ----------------
@@ -45,13 +45,6 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_init failed
- with error code 95 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:92)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
Thread #x: pthread_mutex_destroy of a locked mutex
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:102)
@@ -63,26 +56,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:102)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_lock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:108)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_trylock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_trylock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:116)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_timedlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_timedlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:121)
+make pthread_mutex_lock fail: skipped on glibc < 2.4
----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -90,13 +65,6 @@
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:125)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:125)
-
---------------- pthread_cond_wait et al ----------------
@@ -215,14 +183,6 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:242)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:245)
-
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
@@ -235,4 +195,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 17 errors from 17 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/manuel3.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- manuel3.stderr.exp 2012-01-15 21:19:44.000000000 -0500
+++ manuel3.stderr.out 2012-01-15 22:02:25.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
- at 0x........: gcc_cant_inline_me (manuel3.c:22)
- by 0x........: main (manuel3.c:14)
+ at 0x........: main (manuel3.c:12)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- partial_load_ok.stderr.exp 2012-01-15 21:19:44.000000000 -0500
+++ partial_load_ok.stderr.out 2012-01-15 22:08:05.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,13 @@
-Invalid read of size 4
+Invalid read of size 1
+ at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:16)
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after a block of size 7 alloc'd
+ at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:14)
+
+Invalid read of size 8
at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:23)
- Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 4 alloc'd
+ Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 8 alloc'd
at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:20)
@@ -11,9 +17,9 @@
at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:28)
-Invalid read of size 4
+Invalid read of size 8
at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:37)
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 4 free'd
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 8 free'd
at 0x........: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:36)
@@ -25,4 +31,4 @@
For a detailed leak analysis, rerun with: --leak-check=full
For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok.stderr.diff64
=================================================
--- partial_load_ok.stderr.exp64 2012-01-15 21:19:44.000000000 -0500
+++ partial_load_ok.stderr.out 2012-01-15 22:08:05.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,10 @@
+Invalid read of size 1
+ at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:16)
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after a block of size 7 alloc'd
+ at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:14)
+
Invalid read of size 8
at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:23)
Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 8 alloc'd
@@ -25,4 +31,4 @@
For a detailed leak analysis, rerun with: --leak-check=full
For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp 2012-01-15 21:19:44.000000000 -0500
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2012-01-15 22:17:17.000000000 -0500
@@ -7,8 +7,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (varinfo6.c:4860)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (varinfo6.c:5667)
by 0x........: main (varinfo6.c:6517)
- Location 0x........ is 2 bytes inside local var "budget"
- declared at varinfo6.c:3115, in frame #2 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
=================================================
./valgrind-new/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff-ppc64
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp-ppc64 2012-01-15 21:19:44.000000000 -0500
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2012-01-15 22:17:17.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: mainSort (varinfo6.c:2999)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (varinfo6.c:3143)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (varinfo6.c:4072)
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (varinfo6.c:1699)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (varinfo6.c:5230)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (varinfo6.c:5715)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-ppc
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-ppc 2012-01-15 19:31:54.000000000 -0500
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2012-01-15 21:15:31.000000000 -0500
@@ -7,28 +7,22 @@
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:20)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+ at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
+ by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:47)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+ at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc04_free_lock.stderr.diff-x86
=================================================
--- tc04_free_lock.stderr.exp-x86 2012-01-15 19:31:54.000000000 -0500
+++ tc04_free_lock.stderr.out 2012-01-15 21:15:31.000000000 -0500
@@ -8,7 +8,8 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:26)
+ by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
@@ -16,19 +17,12 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:49)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
+ by 0x........: process_dl_debug (in /lib64/ld-2.3.4.so)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: foo (tc04_free_lock.c:46)
by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:27)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:40)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: bar (tc04_free_lock.c:38)
- by 0x........: main (tc04_free_lock.c:28)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-glibc2.8
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-glibc2.8 2012-01-15 19:31:54.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-01-15 21:15:57.000000000 -0500
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: (below main)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: (below main)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-ppc
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-ppc 2012-01-15 19:31:53.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-01-15 21:15:57.000000000 -0500
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/drd/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff-x86
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp-x86 2012-01-15 19:31:54.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-01-15 21:15:57.000000000 -0500
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
+ by 0x........: ???
mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
@@ -47,13 +47,5 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-Destroying locked mutex: mutex 0x........, recursion count 1, owner 1.
- at 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:45)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-mutex 0x........ was first observed at:
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (drd_pthread_intercepts.c:?)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 6 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp 2012-01-15 19:31:04.000000000 -0500
+++ tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.out 2012-01-15 20:50:57.000000000 -0500
@@ -42,14 +42,6 @@
by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
-
---------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -110,16 +102,8 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
- by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 11 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 9 errors from 9 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc14_laog_dinphils.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc14_laog_dinphils.stderr.exp 2012-01-15 19:31:04.000000000 -0500
+++ tc14_laog_dinphils.stderr.out 2012-01-15 20:51:33.000000000 -0500
@@ -20,5 +20,47 @@
by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
...
+---Thread-Announcement------------------------------------------
-ERROR SUMMARY: 1000 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+Thread #x was created
+ ...
+ by 0x........: pthread_create_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc14_laog_dinphils.c:34)
+
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x: lock order "0x........ before 0x........" violated
+
+Observed (incorrect) order is: acquisition of lock at 0x........
+ (stack unavailable)
+
+ followed by a later acquisition of lock at 0x........
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: dine (tc14_laog_dinphils.c:19)
+ by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+
+---Thread-Announcement------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x was created
+ ...
+ by 0x........: pthread_create_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (tc14_laog_dinphils.c:34)
+
+----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Thread #x: lock order "0x........ before 0x........" violated
+
+Observed (incorrect) order is: acquisition of lock at 0x........
+ (stack unavailable)
+
+ followed by a later acquisition of lock at 0x........
+ at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ by 0x........: dine (tc14_laog_dinphils.c:19)
+ by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
+ ...
+
+
+ERROR SUMMARY: 1096 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc18_semabuse.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc18_semabuse.stderr.exp 2012-01-15 19:31:04.000000000 -0500
+++ tc18_semabuse.stderr.out 2012-01-15 20:52:01.000000000 -0500
@@ -18,13 +18,5 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:34)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc18_semabuse.c:37)
-
-
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/helgrind/tests/tc20_verifywrap.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- tc20_verifywrap.stderr.exp 2012-01-15 19:31:04.000000000 -0500
+++ tc20_verifywrap.stderr.out 2012-01-15 20:53:25.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
------- This is output for >= glibc 2.4 ------
+------ This is output for < glibc 2.4 ------
---------------- pthread_create/join ----------------
@@ -45,13 +45,6 @@
----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_init failed
- with error code 95 (EOPNOTSUPP: Operation not supported on transport endpoint)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:92)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
Thread #x: pthread_mutex_destroy of a locked mutex
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:102)
@@ -63,26 +56,8 @@
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_destroy (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:102)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_lock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:108)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_trylock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_trylock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:116)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_timedlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_timedlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:121)
+make pthread_mutex_lock fail: skipped on glibc < 2.4
----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -90,13 +65,6 @@
at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:125)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:125)
-
---------------- pthread_cond_wait et al ----------------
@@ -215,14 +183,6 @@
by 0x........: sem_wait (hg_intercepts.c:...)
by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:242)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Thread #x's call to sem_post failed
- with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
- at 0x........: sem_post_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: sem_post (hg_intercepts.c:...)
- by 0x........: main (tc20_verifywrap.c:245)
-
FIXME: can't figure out how to verify wrap of sem_post
@@ -235,4 +195,4 @@
...
-ERROR SUMMARY: 23 errors from 23 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 17 errors from 17 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/manuel3.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- manuel3.stderr.exp 2012-01-15 19:31:20.000000000 -0500
+++ manuel3.stderr.out 2012-01-15 20:13:04.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
- at 0x........: gcc_cant_inline_me (manuel3.c:22)
- by 0x........: main (manuel3.c:14)
+ at 0x........: main (manuel3.c:12)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- partial_load_ok.stderr.exp 2012-01-15 19:31:19.000000000 -0500
+++ partial_load_ok.stderr.out 2012-01-15 20:18:52.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,13 @@
-Invalid read of size 4
+Invalid read of size 1
+ at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:16)
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after a block of size 7 alloc'd
+ at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:14)
+
+Invalid read of size 8
at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:23)
- Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 4 alloc'd
+ Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 8 alloc'd
at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:20)
@@ -11,9 +17,9 @@
at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:28)
-Invalid read of size 4
+Invalid read of size 8
at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:37)
- Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 4 free'd
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside a block of size 8 free'd
at 0x........: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:36)
@@ -25,4 +31,4 @@
For a detailed leak analysis, rerun with: --leak-check=full
For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/partial_load_ok.stderr.diff64
=================================================
--- partial_load_ok.stderr.exp64 2012-01-15 19:31:19.000000000 -0500
+++ partial_load_ok.stderr.out 2012-01-15 20:18:52.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,4 +1,10 @@
+Invalid read of size 1
+ at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:16)
+ Address 0x........ is 0 bytes after a block of size 7 alloc'd
+ at 0x........: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...)
+ by 0x........: main (partial_load.c:14)
+
Invalid read of size 8
at 0x........: main (partial_load.c:23)
Address 0x........ is 1 bytes inside a block of size 8 alloc'd
@@ -25,4 +31,4 @@
For a detailed leak analysis, rerun with: --leak-check=full
For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
-ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
+ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp 2012-01-15 19:31:19.000000000 -0500
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2012-01-15 20:28:28.000000000 -0500
@@ -7,8 +7,7 @@
by 0x........: BZ2_bzCompress (varinfo6.c:4860)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffCompress (varinfo6.c:5667)
by 0x........: main (varinfo6.c:6517)
- Location 0x........ is 2 bytes inside local var "budget"
- declared at varinfo6.c:3115, in frame #2 of thread 1
+ Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
=================================================
./valgrind-old/memcheck/tests/varinfo6.stderr.diff-ppc64
=================================================
--- varinfo6.stderr.exp-ppc64 2012-01-15 19:31:19.000000000 -0500
+++ varinfo6.stderr.out 2012-01-15 20:28:28.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: mainSort (varinfo6.c:2999)
by 0x........: BZ2_blockSort (varinfo6.c:3143)
by 0x........: BZ2_compressBlock (varinfo6.c:4072)
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
Address 0x........ is on thread 1's stack
Uninitialised byte(s) found during client check request
- at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:35)
+ at 0x........: croak (varinfo6.c:34)
by 0x........: BZ2_decompress (varinfo6.c:1699)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzDecompress (varinfo6.c:5230)
by 0x........: BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress (varinfo6.c:5715)
|
