|
From: Tom H. <to...@co...> - 2011-11-02 08:34:37
|
On 02/11/11 07:41, Peter Toft wrote: > Actually in the future I would wish that memcheck could be extended so > it could catch it - even if it would cost compile-time changes. > > Valgrind is a great tool, but its user-value would increase quite a bit, > if it could catch a bit more (e.g. like my example). As we have explained, valgrind does support it, just in a different tool. There are performance reasons for keeping them separate because they operate in completely different ways. Tom -- Tom Hughes (to...@co...) http://compton.nu/ |