|
From: Dan K. <da...@ke...> - 2011-04-01 04:16:15
|
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Bob Harris <rsh...@gm...> wrote: >> You will run out of memory more quickly under valgrind that you do normally >> is the basic message. > > Sure, understandable. But to go from a program that is able to > allocate nearly 16G without valgrind to one that fails at 2.8G with > it? That does seem a bit much, I thought Valgrind's memory overhead was an extra bit per byte. - Dan |