Re: [Valgrind-valkyrie-dev] suggestions/questions

[Cerion Armour-B. <ce...@ke...>]

  On 9/24/10 3:29 PM, adu wrote:
> *First of all - I should say superBIG thanks for your work ;)*
Glad to hear you like it - thanks for your input and patches!

> But if even you did not release yet final version of valkyrie - I 
> should ask you guys - do you think about fully standalone tool?
> I mean then you will release final tarball I think I will be the 
> correct if I will say that this archive will contain only SOURCES.
> That means that I should somehow to compile the content of this 
> tarball. But obviously that It would be much easy to release AND 
> standalone AND binary tarballs.
> Isn't it?
>
> P.S. I my case for ex. I 100% can't to install additional QT sources 
> (ver >4). I my company we even do not use qt at all.
> And on all machines simply there is no latest QT frameworks. Only some 
> comps have 3.1 ver on board.
> So I need standalone binary in order to work with valkyrie!
>
I don't see why not... can you add it as a 'wish' on the bugtracker 
please, so we don't forget.
http://bugs.kde.org, product Valkyrie.

> P.P.S. Do you have some milestones? When apox. valkyrie 2.0 will be 
> released?
>
We're trying to get it out in sync with the next Valgrind release, which 
is planned within the next month or so.

> Regards, Anton
Regards,
Cerion