|
From: Bart V. A. <bar...@gm...> - 2009-08-22 10:33:59
|
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 2:49 AM, Nicholas Nethercote <n.n...@gm...> wrote: > I've been thinking about Valgrind's output, in relation to these two bugs: > > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203255 > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204713 > > Here's a summary of a proposal. > [ ... ] I agree that most if not all VG_(printf)() calls should be replaced by VG_(message)() calls, but I'm not sure that it is a good idea to rename VG_(printf)() into something else. Bart. |